BKDV vs REVS
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Which is better, BKDV or REVS?
BKDV has been ahead.
REVS has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. BKDV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKDV | REVS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.19%Best |
| AUM | $2.2B | $370M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.84% |
| Holdings | 84 | 611 |
| YTD Return | +17.11% | +18.22%Best |
| 1Y Return | +23.83%Best | +23.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.45% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Tie | 11.8%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5%Best | -16.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,788Best | $13,720 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.5%Best | 33.6% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | Sep 25, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 4, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
BKDV vs REVS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
BKDV vs REVS Performance
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year BKDV returned +23.83% while REVS returned +23.33%. Year to date, BKDV is up 17.11% versus a gain of 18.22% for REVS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKDV and REVS have been equally volatile, both at 11.8% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BKDV and -16.4% for REVS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKDV charges 0.60% per year while REVS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $19 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKDV currently yields 0.53% against 1.84% for REVS.
Holdings Overlap
32.7% of BKDV's money is in holdings REVS also owns. 38.8% of REVS's money is in holdings BKDV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
24 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 298 in REVS, against full books of 84 and 611.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 261 positions for REVS that do not appear in our book for BKDV (59.6% of the fund), and 54 for BKDV that do not appear in REVS (66.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKDV | Weight in REVS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.98% | 7.16% | 2.18% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.28% | 8.48% | 5.20% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.78% | 3.84% | 3.06% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.21% | 1.62% | 0.59% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.20% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 1.81% | 1.23% | 0.58% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 1.06% | 1.96% | 0.90% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.79% | 2.05% | 1.26% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.85% | 1.72% | 0.87% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 1.79% | 0.74% | 1.05% |
38.8% of REVS is already inside BKDV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKDV or REVS?
BKDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while REVS charges 0.19%. REVS is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKDV or REVS?
Over the past year BKDV returned +23.83% vs +23.33% for REVS, so BKDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKDV annualized +18.42% vs +18.11% for REVS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKDV or REVS?
BKDV and REVS have been equally volatile, both at 11.8% annualized. Worst drawdown: BKDV -15.5% vs REVS -16.4%.
Should I hold both BKDV and REVS?
BKDV and REVS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKDV and REVS?
38.8% of REVS's money is in holdings BKDV also owns. 38.8% of REVS's is in holdings BKDV also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 298 in REVS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKDV or REVS?
BKDV yields 0.53% while REVS yields 1.84%, so REVS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REVS better than BKDV?
REVS has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. BKDV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.