BKDV vs SASS
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF vs M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF
Which is better, BKDV or SASS?
BKDV costs less.
BKDV has a lower expense ratio. BKDV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKDV | SASS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $2.2B | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 84 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +17.11%Best | -7.30% |
| 1Y Return | +23.83% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.5%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | MD Sass |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | Mar 4, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BKDV vs SASS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BKDV vs SASS Performance
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass. Year to date, BKDV is up 17.11% versus a loss of 7.30% for SASS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKDV charges 0.60% per year while SASS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $75 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKDV currently yields 0.53% against 0.00% for SASS.
Holdings Overlap
7.3% of BKDV's money is in holdings SASS also owns. 11.7% of SASS's money is in holdings BKDV also owns.
SASS and BKDV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 22 in SASS, against full books of 84 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 79 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
BKDV holds 75 positions SASS does not, 90.8% of the fund.
Largest: MSFT 4.98%, JPM 4.03%, AAPL 3.28%, JNJ 2.74%, UNH 2.65%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKDV and SASS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKDV or SASS?
BKDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SASS charges 0.75%. BKDV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BKDV and SASS?
11.7% of SASS's money is in holdings BKDV also owns. 11.7% of SASS's is in holdings BKDV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 22 in SASS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKDV or SASS?
BKDV yields 0.53% while SASS yields 0.00%, so BKDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SASS better than BKDV?
BKDV has a lower expense ratio. BKDV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.