BKEM vs VOO
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BKEM or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BKEM led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKEM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKEM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $107M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 3.76% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,795 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +15.77%Best | +13.57% |
| 1Y Return | +23.55%Best | +17.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.40% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.23% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.5% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,177 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 22, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 24, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.5 years).
BKEM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.5 years both funds cover.
BKEM vs VOO Performance
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKEM returned +23.55% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, BKEM is up 15.77% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Over three years, BKEM compounded at +21.40% per year against +22.46% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.23% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +18.17% annualized vs +11.55%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.5% for BKEM and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKEM charges 0.11% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKEM currently yields 3.76% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of BKEM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings BKEM also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1,776 positions we hold weights for in BKEM and 504 in VOO, against full books of 1,795 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 498 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for BKEM (99.7% of the fund), and 15 for BKEM that do not appear in VOO (1.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKEM | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALHalliburton Co. | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.01% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKEM and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKEM or VOO?
BKEM has an expense ratio of 0.11% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKEM or VOO?
Over the past year BKEM returned +23.55% vs +17.55% for VOO, so BKEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BKEM annualized +11.55% vs +18.17% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKEM or VOO?
BKEM has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BKEM -39.5% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both BKEM and VOO?
BKEM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKEM or VOO?
BKEM yields 3.76% while VOO yields 1.06%, so BKEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than BKEM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. BKEM led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BKEM is less concentrated, with 36.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.