BKGI vs VYM
BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BKGI or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BKGI led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKGI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.9B | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.11% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 38 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +0.83% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.75% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.73%Best | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $18,564Best | $16,864 |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.8% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).
BKGI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
BKGI vs VYM Performance
BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKGI returned +5.75% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, BKGI is up 0.83% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Over three years, BKGI compounded at +19.73% per year against +18.60% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, BKGI has the edge at +17.19% annualized vs +14.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 11.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for BKGI and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKGI charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKGI currently yields 3.11% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
12.5% of BKGI's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's money is in holdings BKGI also owns.
BKGI and VYM share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BKGI and 602 in VYM, against full books of 38 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 568 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BKGI (97.2% of the fund), and 8 for BKGI that do not appear in VYM (29.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKGI and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKGI or VYM?
BKGI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKGI or VYM?
Over the past year BKGI returned +5.75% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BKGI annualized +17.19% vs +14.34% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKGI or VYM?
BKGI has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 11.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BKGI -14.8% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both BKGI and VYM?
BKGI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKGI and VYM?
12.5% of BKGI's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's is in holdings BKGI also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BKGI and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKGI or VYM?
BKGI yields 3.11% while VYM yields 2.37%, so BKGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BKGI?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BKGI led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.