BKIS vs DMXU
BNY Mellon Sustainable International Equity ETF vs Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF
Which is better, BKIS or DMXU?
Nearly the same fund. DMXU costs less.
DMXU has a lower expense ratio. DMXU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKIS | DMXU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $65M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.13% | 3.87% |
| Holdings | 42 | 360 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 18.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -30.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $8,929 | $10,639Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Xtrackers ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 14, 2021 | Sep 5, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 712 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BKIS has data through Nov 1, 2024 and DMXU through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 15, 2021 to Nov 1, 2024 (2.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 18.5% for DMXU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for BKIS and -30.6% for DMXU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKIS charges 0.70% per year while DMXU charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKIS currently yields 1.13% against 3.87% for DMXU.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKIS and DMXU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKIS or DMXU?
BKIS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while DMXU charges 0.03%. DMXU is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BKIS or DMXU?
BKIS has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 18.5% for DMXU. Worst drawdown: BKIS -34.0% vs DMXU -30.6%.
Should I hold both BKIS and DMXU?
BKIS and DMXU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKIS or DMXU?
BKIS yields 1.13% while DMXU yields 3.87%, so DMXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DMXU better than BKIS?
DMXU has a lower expense ratio. DMXU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.