BKIS vs NTSI
BNY Mellon Sustainable International Equity ETF vs WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
Which is better, BKIS or NTSI?
Nearly the same fund. NTSI costs less.
NTSI has a lower expense ratio. NTSI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKIS | NTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.26%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $476M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.13% | 3.14% |
| Holdings | 42 | 466 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 19.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -32.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $8,929 | $9,838Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 14, 2021 | May 20, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 712 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BKIS has data through Nov 1, 2024 and NTSI through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 15, 2021 to Nov 1, 2024 (2.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKIS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 19.6% for NTSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for BKIS and -32.6% for NTSI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKIS charges 0.70% per year while NTSI charges 0.26%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $26 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKIS currently yields 1.13% against 3.14% for NTSI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKIS and NTSI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKIS or NTSI?
BKIS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while NTSI charges 0.26%. NTSI is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BKIS or NTSI?
BKIS has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 19.6% for NTSI. Worst drawdown: BKIS -34.0% vs NTSI -32.6%.
Should I hold both BKIS and NTSI?
BKIS and NTSI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKIS or NTSI?
BKIS yields 1.13% while NTSI yields 3.14%, so NTSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NTSI better than BKIS?
NTSI has a lower expense ratio. NTSI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.