BKMI vs NEA

BKMI vs NEA

Which is better, BKMI or NEA?

BKMI has been ahead.

BKMI has a lower expense ratio. BKMI led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: BKMIHigher Returns (1Y): BKMI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBKMINEA
Expense Ratio0.35%Best3.53%
AUM$1.5B$3.1B
Dividend Yield1.93%8.08%
Holdings1,0681,062
YTD Return-3.38%Best-10.73%
1Y Return--7.38%
3Y Return (annualized)-+7.96%
5Y Return (annualized)--2.59%
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementNuveen
CategoryTax PreferredTax Preferred
StyleMunicipal BondMunicipal Bond
InceptionJan 12, 2026Nov 21, 2002

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

BKMI vs NEA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BKMI against instead:BKMI vs SPYBKMI vs QQQBKMI vs VOOBKMI vs VTINEA against:NEA vs VXUS

BKMI vs NEA Performance

BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, BKMI is down 3.38% versus a loss of 10.73% for NEA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BKMI charges 0.35% per year while NEA charges 3.53%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $353 annually, a gap of $318 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKMI currently yields 1.93% against 8.08% for NEA.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 111 holdings in BKMI and 335 in NEA, totalling 28.5% and 40.0% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 12 positions appear in both.

The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, BKMI as of Oct 2, 2026 and NEA as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

12 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in BKMI and 335 in NEA, against full books of 1,068 and 1,062.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BKMIWeight in NEADifference
NY NYCDEV 5 11/15/20Nycdev 5.000 11/15/440.94%0.46%0.48%
GA MAIUTL 09/01/2053Main Street Natural Gas Inc Ga Gas Supply Revenue 2053-09-010.64%0.07%0.57%
NJ TOBGEN 5 06/01/20Fx.rt. Muni Bond0.63%0.04%0.59%
TX TXSWTR 4 10/15/20Texas Water Development Board 0.04 10/15/20370.58%0.09%0.49%
NY MTATRN 5 11/15/20Metropolitan Transportation Authority 0.31%0.30%0.01%
NY TRBTRN 0 11/15/20Triborough Ny Bridge & Tunnel Auth Revenues0.55%0.02%0.53%
TX DALAPT 5 11/01/20Dallas & Fort-C-Ref 5 11/1/2031 5 2031-11-010.32%0.16%0.16%
IL ILSTRN 5 01/01/20Illinois State Toll Highway Authority 5.0% 01-01-420.20%0.20%0.00%
CA NWHSCD 0 08/01/20New Haven Unified School District,0,2033-08-010.19%0.20%0.01%
NY NYSHGR 4 03/15/20New York St Dorm Auth St Pers 4% Mar 15, 20380.29%0.07%0.22%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BKMI and NEA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BKMINEA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BKMI or NEA?

BKMI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while NEA charges 3.53%. BKMI is the cheaper option, by $318 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, BKMI or NEA?

BKMI yields 1.93% while NEA yields 8.08%, so NEA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NEA better than BKMI?

BKMI has a lower expense ratio. BKMI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.