BKMI vs NMI
BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF vs Nuveen Municipal Income Fund Inc.
Which is better, BKMI or NMI?
BKMI has been ahead.
BKMI has a lower expense ratio. BKMI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKMI | NMI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $1.5B | $115M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.93% | 4.94% |
| Holdings | 1,068 | 220 |
| YTD Return | -3.38%Best | -3.61% |
| 1Y Return | - | -3.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -0.83% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Nuveen |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Tax Preferred |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Municipal Bond |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2026 | Apr 20, 1988 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BKMI vs NMI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BKMI vs NMI Performance
BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund Inc. (NMI) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, BKMI is down 3.38% versus a loss of 3.61% for NMI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKMI charges 0.35% per year while NMI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $75 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKMI currently yields 1.93% against 4.94% for NMI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 111 holdings in BKMI and 99 in NMI, totalling 28.5% and 41.5% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 3 positions appear in both.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, BKMI as of Oct 2, 2026 and NMI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
3 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in BKMI and 99 in NMI, against full books of 1,068 and 220.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKMI | Weight in NMI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NY NYCDEV 5 11/15/20Nycdev 5.000 11/15/44 | 0.94% | 0.84% | 0.10% |
| NJ TOBGEN 5 06/01/20Tobacco Settlement Fing Corp Nj | 0.63% | 0.83% | 0.20% |
| GU GMSUTL 5.25 07/01Guam Govt Wtrwks Auth Wtr Ws Guam Wtrwks Auth A | 0.06% | 1.06% | 1.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BKMI and NMI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKMI or NMI?
BKMI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while NMI charges 0.75%. BKMI is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKMI or NMI?
BKMI yields 1.93% while NMI yields 4.94%, so NMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NMI better than BKMI?
BKMI has a lower expense ratio. BKMI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.