BKMI vs NUV

BKMI vs NUV

Which is better, BKMI or NUV?

BKMI has been ahead.

BKMI has a lower expense ratio. BKMI led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: BKMIHigher Returns (1Y): BKMI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBKMINUV
Expense Ratio0.35%Best0.66%
AUM$1.5B$1.8B
Dividend Yield1.93%4.59%
Holdings1,068474
YTD Return-3.38%Best-7.62%
1Y Return--6.52%
3Y Return (annualized)-+4.11%
5Y Return (annualized)--3.11%
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementNuveen
CategoryTax PreferredTax Preferred
StyleMunicipal BondMunicipal Bond
InceptionJan 12, 2026Jun 17, 1987

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

BKMI vs NUV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BKMI against instead:BKMI vs SPYBKMI vs QQQBKMI vs VOOBKMI vs VTINUV against:NUV vs VXUS

BKMI vs NUV Performance

BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, BKMI is down 3.38% versus a loss of 7.62% for NUV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BKMI charges 0.35% per year while NUV charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $66 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKMI currently yields 1.93% against 4.59% for NUV.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 111 holdings in BKMI and 192 in NUV, totalling 28.5% and 41.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 8 positions appear in both.

The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, BKMI as of Oct 2, 2026 and NUV as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

8 positions in common, counted across the 111 positions we hold weights for in BKMI and 192 in NUV, against full books of 1,068 and 474.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BKMIWeight in NUVDifference
NY NYCDEV 5 11/15/20Nycdev 5.000 11/15/440.94%0.62%0.32%
NY MTATRN 5 11/15/20Metropolitan Transportation Authority 0.31%0.44%0.13%
NJ TOBGEN 5 06/01/20Fx.rt. Muni Bond0.63%0.11%0.52%
NY NYTTRN 5 07/01/20New York Transportation Development Corp. (Laguardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment), Series 2016 A, Rb0.12%0.44%0.32%
NY NYSHGR 4 03/15/20New York St Dorm Auth St Pers 4% Mar 15, 20380.29%0.20%0.09%
IL ILSTRN 5 01/01/20Illinois State Toll Highway Authority 5.0% 01-01-420.20%0.21%0.01%
AZ CHADEV 06/01/2049Industrial Development (Intel Corporation) Rb Series 20190.31%0.08%0.23%
CA LOSUTL 5 07/01/20Los Angeles (City Of), Ca Department Of Water0.04%0.08%0.04%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BKMI and NUV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BKMINUV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BKMI or NUV?

BKMI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while NUV charges 0.66%. BKMI is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, BKMI or NUV?

BKMI yields 1.93% while NUV yields 4.59%, so NUV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NUV better than BKMI?

BKMI has a lower expense ratio. BKMI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.