BLCR vs JUST
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, BLCR or JUST?
BLCR has been ahead.
JUST has a lower expense ratio. BLCR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. JUST is less concentrated, with 41.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCR | JUST |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.20%Best |
| AUM | $9.8B | $572M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 0.94% |
| Holdings | 52 | 461 |
| YTD Return | +16.18%Best | +14.35% |
| 1Y Return | +25.71%Best | +18.75% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.24%Best | +22.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.57% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $20,600Best | $19,354 |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.6% | 41.9%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Goldman Sachs Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2023 | Jun 7, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 26, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
BLCR vs JUST growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BLCR vs JUST Performance
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF (BLCR) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Over the past year BLCR returned +25.71% while JUST returned +18.75%. Year to date, BLCR is up 16.18% versus a gain of 14.35% for JUST.
Over three years, BLCR compounded at +27.24% per year against +22.22% for JUST.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 12.3% for JUST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for BLCR and -19.3% for JUST. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCR charges 0.36% per year while JUST charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $20 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCR currently yields 0.32% against 0.94% for JUST.
Holdings Overlap
71.9% of BLCR's money is in holdings JUST also owns. 49.4% of JUST's money is in holdings BLCR also owns.
Most of BLCR is already inside JUST. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
36 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in BLCR and 462 in JUST, against full books of 52 and 461.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 414 positions for JUST that do not appear in our book for BLCR (50.0% of the fund), and 15 for BLCR that do not appear in JUST (25.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BLCR | Weight in JUST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.36% | 8.84% | 1.48% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.47% | 6.25% | 0.22% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.55% | 7.84% | 3.29% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.72% | 4.86% | 0.86% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.00% | 3.24% | 1.76% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.50% | 2.03% | 1.47% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.20% | 1.14% | 3.06% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.58% | 1.64% | 0.94% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.34% | 2.62% | 1.28% |
| CAHCardinal Health Inc. | 3.50% | 0.11% | 3.39% |
71.9% of BLCR is already inside JUST.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCR or JUST?
BLCR has an expense ratio of 0.36% while JUST charges 0.20%. JUST is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BLCR or JUST?
Over the past year BLCR returned +25.71% vs +18.75% for JUST, so BLCR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BLCR or JUST?
BLCR has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 12.3% for JUST. Worst drawdown: BLCR -21.3% vs JUST -19.3%.
Should I hold both BLCR and JUST?
BLCR and JUST have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCR and JUST?
71.9% of BLCR's money is in holdings JUST also owns. 49.4% of JUST's is in holdings BLCR also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in BLCR and 462 in JUST.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCR or JUST?
BLCR yields 0.32% while JUST yields 0.94%, so JUST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JUST better than BLCR?
JUST has a lower expense ratio. BLCR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. JUST is less concentrated, with 41.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.