BLCR vs SCHK
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF vs Schwab 1000 Index ETF
Which is better, BLCR or SCHK?
BLCR has been ahead.
SCHK has a lower expense ratio. BLCR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. SCHK is less concentrated, with 36.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCR | SCHK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9.8B | $5.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 52 | 986 |
| YTD Return | +16.18%Best | +13.20% |
| 1Y Return | +25.71%Best | +16.85% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.24%Best | +22.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.41% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 12.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.3% | -19.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $20,600Best | $19,414 |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.6% | 36.0%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2023 | Oct 11, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 26, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3 years).
BLCR vs SCHK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
BLCR vs SCHK Performance
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF (BLCR) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BLCR returned +25.71% while SCHK returned +16.85%. Year to date, BLCR is up 16.18% versus a gain of 13.20% for SCHK.
Over three years, BLCR compounded at +27.24% per year against +22.21% for SCHK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 12.5% for SCHK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.3% for BLCR and -19.2% for SCHK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCR charges 0.36% per year while SCHK charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $3 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCR currently yields 0.32% against 1.04% for SCHK.
Holdings Overlap
90.8% of BLCR's money is in holdings SCHK also owns. 44.9% of SCHK's money is in holdings BLCR also owns.
Most of BLCR is already inside SCHK. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
47 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in BLCR and 998 in SCHK, against full books of 52 and 986.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 905 positions for SCHK that do not appear in our book for BLCR (54.2% of the fund), and 4 for BLCR that do not appear in SCHK (6.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BLCR | Weight in SCHK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.36% | 7.83% | 0.47% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.47% | 5.32% | 1.15% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.55% | 6.74% | 2.19% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.72% | 3.42% | 2.30% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.00% | 2.79% | 2.21% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.18% | 2.22% | 2.96% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.50% | 1.68% | 1.82% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.20% | 0.85% | 3.35% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.58% | 1.43% | 1.15% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.34% | 2.34% | 1.00% |
90.8% of BLCR is already inside SCHK.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCR or SCHK?
BLCR has an expense ratio of 0.36% while SCHK charges 0.03%. SCHK is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BLCR or SCHK?
Over the past year BLCR returned +25.71% vs +16.85% for SCHK, so BLCR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BLCR or SCHK?
BLCR has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 12.5% for SCHK. Worst drawdown: BLCR -21.3% vs SCHK -19.2%.
Should I hold both BLCR and SCHK?
BLCR and SCHK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCR and SCHK?
90.8% of BLCR's money is in holdings SCHK also owns. 44.9% of SCHK's is in holdings BLCR also owns. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in BLCR and 998 in SCHK.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCR or SCHK?
BLCR yields 0.32% while SCHK yields 1.04%, so SCHK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHK better than BLCR?
SCHK has a lower expense ratio. BLCR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. SCHK is less concentrated, with 36.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.