BLCV vs SASS
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF vs M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF
Which is better, BLCV or SASS?
BLCV costs less.
BLCV has a lower expense ratio. BLCV is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCV | SASS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $347M | $76M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 56 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +12.91%Best | -7.30% |
| 1Y Return | +20.02% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.66% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.0%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | MD Sass |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 19, 2023 | Mar 4, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BLCV vs SASS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BLCV vs SASS Performance
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF (BLCV) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass. Year to date, BLCV is up 12.91% versus a loss of 7.30% for SASS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCV charges 0.45% per year while SASS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $75 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCV currently yields 1.30% against 0.00% for SASS.
Holdings Overlap
9.3% of BLCV's money is in holdings SASS also owns. 11.7% of SASS's money is in holdings BLCV also owns.
SASS and BLCV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BLCV and 22 in SASS, against full books of 56 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 54 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
BLCV holds 51 positions SASS does not, 88.2% of the fund.
Largest: MSFT 8.93%, AAPL 5.97%, CVX 3.82%, SCHW 2.96%, MRK 2.66%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BLCV and SASS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCV or SASS?
BLCV has an expense ratio of 0.45% while SASS charges 0.75%. BLCV is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCV and SASS?
11.7% of SASS's money is in holdings BLCV also owns. 11.7% of SASS's is in holdings BLCV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in BLCV and 22 in SASS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCV or SASS?
BLCV yields 1.30% while SASS yields 0.00%, so BLCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SASS better than BLCV?
BLCV has a lower expense ratio. BLCV is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.