BLDX vs IVV

BLDX vs IVV

Which is better, BLDX or IVV?

IVV has been ahead.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBLDXIVV
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%Best
AUM$100M$896.5B
Dividend Yield1.04%1.10%
Holdings41508
YTD Return-0.88%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.28%
Top 10 Weight40.3%38.9%Best
Fund FamilyImpax Asset ManagementiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 2, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BLDX vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BLDX vs IVV Performance

Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) is an ETF from Impax Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BLDX is down 0.88% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BLDX charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLDX currently yields 1.04% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

BLDX already in IVV33.1%
IVV already in BLDX1.6%

33.1% of BLDX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.6% of IVV's money is in holdings BLDX also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

11 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BLDX and 506 in IVV, against full books of 41 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 489 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BLDX (97.8% of the fund), and 7 for BLDX that do not appear in IVV (14.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BLDXWeight in IVVDifference
UNPUnion Pacific Corp4.59%0.24%4.35%
AWKAmerican Water Works Co. Inc.4.34%0.04%4.30%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.4.17%0.09%4.08%
NEENextera Energy Inc3.62%0.24%3.38%
VMCVulcan Materials Co.3.81%0.05%3.76%
WELLWelltower, Inc.2.84%0.25%2.59%
HCAHca Healthcare Inc.2.45%0.09%2.36%
WABWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.2.10%0.07%2.03%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares1.72%0.33%1.39%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation1.81%0.11%1.70%

33.1% of BLDX is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BLDXIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BLDX or IVV?

BLDX has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between BLDX and IVV?

33.1% of BLDX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.6% of IVV's is in holdings BLDX also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in BLDX and 506 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BLDX or IVV?

BLDX yields 1.04% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than BLDX?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.