BLLD vs NBXG
JPMorgan Sustainable Infrastructure ETF vs Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc
Which is better, BLLD or NBXG?
NBXG has been ahead.
BLLD has a lower expense ratio. NBXG led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLLD | NBXG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 1.30% |
| AUM | $21M | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.64% | 7.97% |
| Holdings | 61 | 137 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1%Best | 18.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.0% | -18.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $10,569 | $15,106Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | May 25, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 572 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BLLD has data through Mar 21, 2025 and NBXG through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2022 to Mar 21, 2025 (2.5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 17.1% for BLLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for BLLD and -18.2% for NBXG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLLD charges 0.49% per year while NBXG charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $130 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLLD currently yields 1.64% against 7.97% for NBXG.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BLLD and NBXG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLLD or NBXG?
BLLD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while NBXG charges 1.30%. BLLD is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BLLD or NBXG?
NBXG has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 17.1% for BLLD. Worst drawdown: BLLD -21.0% vs NBXG -18.2%.
Should I hold both BLLD and NBXG?
BLLD and NBXG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLLD or NBXG?
BLLD yields 1.64% while NBXG yields 7.97%, so NBXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBXG better than BLLD?
BLLD has a lower expense ratio. NBXG led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.