BMAR vs BUYW

BMAR vs BUYW

Which is better, BMAR or BUYW?

BMAR has been ahead.

BMAR has a lower expense ratio. BMAR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: BMARHigher Returns: BMAR

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBMARBUYW
Expense Ratio0.79%Best0.99%
AUM$207M$1.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%5.97%
Holdings1844
YTD Return+12.05%Best+2.17%
1Y Return+15.70%Best+3.56%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.20%Best+7.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.11%-
Volatility (annualized)8.4%4.5%Best
Max Drawdown-12.9%-9.4%Best
$10,000 over 4.1 years$18,016Best$13,909
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustMain Management Fund Advisors, LLC
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionFeb 28, 2020Dec 29, 2015

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.1 years).

BMAR vs BUYW growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.

Compare BMAR against instead:BMAR vs SPYBMAR vs QQQBMAR vs VOOBMAR vs VTIBUYW against:BUYW vs VXUS

BMAR vs BUYW Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Main BuyWrite ETF (BUYW) is an ETF from Main Management Fund Advisors, LLC. Over the past year BMAR returned +15.70% while BUYW returned +3.56%. Year to date, BMAR is up 12.05% versus a gain of 2.17% for BUYW.

Over three years, BMAR compounded at +17.20% per year against +7.50% for BUYW. Across the full 4-year window we track, BMAR has the edge at +15.44% annualized vs +8.38%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BMAR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.4% compared with 4.5% for BUYW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.9% for BMAR and -9.4% for BUYW. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BMAR charges 0.79% per year while BUYW charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $99 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BMAR currently yields 0.00% against 5.97% for BUYW.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BMAR and BUYW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BMARBUYW

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BMAR or BUYW?

BMAR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while BUYW charges 0.99%. BMAR is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BMAR or BUYW?

Over the past year BMAR returned +15.70% vs +3.56% for BUYW, so BMAR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BMAR annualized +15.44% vs +8.38% for BUYW. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BMAR or BUYW?

BMAR has been the more volatile fund at 8.4% annualized versus 4.5% for BUYW. Worst drawdown: BMAR -12.9% vs BUYW -9.4%.

Should I hold both BMAR and BUYW?

BMAR and BUYW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BMAR or BUYW?

BMAR yields 0.00% while BUYW yields 5.97%, so BUYW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is BUYW better than BMAR?

BMAR has a lower expense ratio. BMAR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.