BMAY vs XTJA

BMAY vs XTJA

Which is better, BMAY or XTJA?

Each has led over a different period.

BMAY led over 3Y and the full window, XTJA over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBMAYXTJA
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$239M$20M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1815
YTD Return+8.86%+11.94%Best
1Y Return+11.65%+15.10%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+15.64%Best+14.83%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.89%-
Volatility (annualized)10.1%Best13.6%
Max Drawdown-17.7%Best-26.2%
$10,000 over 4.8 years$14,702Best$14,264
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionApr 30, 2020Dec 31, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).

BMAY vs XTJA growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.

Compare BMAY against instead:BMAY vs SPYBMAY vs QQQBMAY vs VOOBMAY vs VTIXTJA against:XTJA vs VXUS

BMAY vs XTJA Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year BMAY returned +11.65% while XTJA returned +15.10%. Year to date, BMAY is up 8.86% versus a gain of 11.94% for XTJA.

Over three years, BMAY compounded at +15.64% per year against +14.83% for XTJA.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XTJA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 10.1% for BMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for BMAY and -26.2% for XTJA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BMAY charges 0.79% per year while XTJA charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, BMAY currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for XTJA.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BMAY and XTJA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BMAYXTJA

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BMAY or XTJA?

BMAY has an expense ratio of 0.79% while XTJA charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, BMAY or XTJA?

Over the past year BMAY returned +11.65% vs +15.10% for XTJA, so XTJA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BMAY or XTJA?

XTJA has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 10.1% for BMAY. Worst drawdown: BMAY -17.7% vs XTJA -26.2%.

Should I hold both BMAY and XTJA?

BMAY and XTJA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BMAY or XTJA?

BMAY yields 0.00% while XTJA yields 0.00%, so XTJA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XTJA better than BMAY?

BMAY led over 3Y and the full window, XTJA over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.