BME vs FDIV
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust vs MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF
Which is better, BME or FDIV?
BME has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. BME led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BME | FDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.14% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $591M | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.87% | 2.61% |
| Holdings | 156 | 224 |
| YTD Return | +13.85%Best | -0.05% |
| 1Y Return | +26.79%Best | +2.12% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.27%Best | +6.26% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.83% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.4%Best | -18.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $14,119Best | $11,722 |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.5% | 33.0%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | MarketDesk Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2005 | Sep 19, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
BME vs FDIV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
BME vs FDIV Performance
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust (BME) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices. Over the past year BME returned +26.79% while FDIV returned +2.12%. Year to date, BME is up 13.85% versus a loss of 0.05% for FDIV.
Over three years, BME compounded at +12.27% per year against +6.26% for FDIV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 12.8% for FDIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.4% for BME and -18.6% for FDIV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BME charges 1.14% per year while FDIV charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $114 vs $35 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BME currently yields 6.87% against 2.61% for FDIV.
Holdings Overlap
20.7% of BME's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 7.7% of FDIV's money is in holdings BME also owns.
BME and FDIV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, BME as of Jun 30, 2026 and FDIV as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in BME and 111 in FDIV, against full books of 156 and 224.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 102 positions for FDIV that do not appear in our book for BME (90.3% of the fund), and 109 for BME that do not appear in FDIV (69.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
20.7% of BME is already inside FDIV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BME or FDIV?
BME has an expense ratio of 1.14% while FDIV charges 0.35%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BME or FDIV?
Over the past year BME returned +26.79% vs +2.12% for FDIV, so BME leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BME or FDIV?
BME has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 12.8% for FDIV. Worst drawdown: BME -14.4% vs FDIV -18.6%.
Should I hold both BME and FDIV?
BME and FDIV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BME and FDIV?
20.7% of BME's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 7.7% of FDIV's is in holdings BME also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in BME and 111 in FDIV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BME or FDIV?
BME yields 6.87% while FDIV yields 2.61%, so BME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDIV better than BME?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. BME led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.