BME vs ZAP
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust vs Global X US Electrification ETF
Which is better, BME or ZAP?
BME has been ahead.
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. BME led over 1Y and the full window. ZAP is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BME | ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.14% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $591M | $440M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.87% | 1.74% |
| Holdings | 156 | 94 |
| YTD Return | +13.85%Best | +6.45% |
| 1Y Return | +26.79%Best | +2.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.83% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8% | -13.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,528Best | $13,487 |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.5% | 44.2%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2005 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
BME vs ZAP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
BME vs ZAP Performance
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust (BME) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Global X US Electrification ETF (ZAP) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year BME returned +26.79% while ZAP returned +2.72%. Year to date, BME is up 13.85% versus a gain of 6.45% for ZAP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 14.9% for BME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BME and -13.0% for ZAP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BME charges 1.14% per year while ZAP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $114 vs $50 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BME currently yields 6.87% against 1.74% for ZAP.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 133 holdings in BME and 45 in ZAP, totalling 95.6% and 100.4% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 94 days apart, BME as of Jun 30, 2026 and ZAP as of Oct 2, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in BME and 45 in ZAP, against full books of 156 and 94.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 44 positions for ZAP that do not appear in our book for BME (98.8% of the fund), and 113 for BME that do not appear in ZAP (89.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BME and ZAP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BME or ZAP?
BME has an expense ratio of 1.14% while ZAP charges 0.50%. ZAP is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BME or ZAP?
Over the past year BME returned +26.79% vs +2.72% for ZAP, so BME leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BME annualized +18.28% vs +18.08% for ZAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BME or ZAP?
ZAP has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 14.9% for BME. Worst drawdown: BME -13.8% vs ZAP -13.0%.
Should I hold both BME and ZAP?
BME and ZAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BME or ZAP?
BME yields 6.87% while ZAP yields 1.74%, so BME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZAP better than BME?
ZAP has a lower expense ratio. BME led over 1Y and the full window. ZAP is less concentrated, with 44.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.