BNDC vs FIIG

BNDC vs FIIG

Which is better, BNDC or FIIG?

Nearly the same fund. BNDC costs less.

BNDC has a lower expense ratio. BNDC led over 1Y, FIIG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.

Lower Fees: BNDCHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBNDCFIIG
Expense Ratio0.38%Best0.49%
AUM$165M$628M
Dividend Yield4.33%5.26%
Holdings16471
YTD Return-2.88%Best-3.13%
1Y Return-2.81%Best-3.25%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.23%+5.42%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-0.95%-
Volatility (annualized)5.8%Best6.4%
Max Drawdown-5.2%Best-5.5%
$10,000 over 3.2 years$11,037$11,435Best
Fund FamilyNorthern Trust Asset ManagementFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionNov 18, 2016Aug 2, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 3, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).

BNDC vs FIIG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.

Compare BNDC against instead:BNDC vs SPYBNDC vs QQQBNDC vs VOOBNDC vs VTIFIIG against:FIIG vs VXUS

BNDC vs FIIG Performance

Northern Trust Core Bond ETF (BNDC) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and First Trust Intermediate Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FIIG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year BNDC returned -2.81% while FIIG returned -3.25%. Year to date, BNDC is down 2.88% versus a loss of 3.13% for FIIG.

Over three years, BNDC compounded at +4.23% per year against +5.42% for FIIG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FIIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.4% compared with 5.8% for BNDC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.2% for BNDC and -5.5% for FIIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BNDC charges 0.38% per year while FIIG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $49 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BNDC currently yields 4.33% against 5.26% for FIIG.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BNDC and FIIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BNDCFIIG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BNDC or FIIG?

BNDC has an expense ratio of 0.38% while FIIG charges 0.49%. BNDC is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BNDC or FIIG?

Over the past year BNDC returned -2.81% vs -3.25% for FIIG, so BNDC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BNDC or FIIG?

FIIG has been the more volatile fund at 6.4% annualized versus 5.8% for BNDC. Worst drawdown: BNDC -5.2% vs FIIG -5.5%.

Should I hold both BNDC and FIIG?

BNDC and FIIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BNDC or FIIG?

BNDC yields 4.33% while FIIG yields 5.26%, so FIIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FIIG better than BNDC?

BNDC has a lower expense ratio. BNDC led over 1Y, FIIG over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.