BNDC vs RIGS
Northern Trust Core Bond ETF vs ALPS Strategic Income Fund
Which is better, BNDC or RIGS?
RIGS has been ahead.
BNDC has a lower expense ratio. RIGS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BNDC | RIGS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.46% |
| AUM | $165M | $56M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.33% | 5.02% |
| Holdings | 16 | 84 |
| YTD Return | -2.88% | -0.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.81% | -0.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.23% | +5.06%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.95% | +1.67%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3% | 5.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.2% | -18.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,534 | $10,863Best |
| Fund Family | Northern Trust Asset Management | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Nov 18, 2016 | Oct 7, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 22, 2016 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.9 years).
BNDC vs RIGS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.9 years both funds cover.
BNDC vs RIGS Performance
Northern Trust Core Bond ETF (BNDC) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management and ALPS Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year BNDC returned -2.81% while RIGS returned -0.44%. Year to date, BNDC is down 2.88% versus a loss of 0.64% for RIGS.
Over three years, BNDC compounded at +4.23% per year against +5.06% for RIGS; over five years the annualized figures are -0.95% and +1.67% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, RIGS has the edge at +0.93% annualized vs +0.12%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BNDC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.3% compared with 5.0% for RIGS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.2% for BNDC and -18.2% for RIGS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BNDC charges 0.38% per year while RIGS charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $46 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BNDC currently yields 4.33% against 5.02% for RIGS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 7 holdings in BNDC and 58 in RIGS, totalling 99.2% and 72.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 7 positions we hold weights for in BNDC and 58 in RIGS, against full books of 16 and 84.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BNDC and RIGS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BNDC or RIGS?
BNDC has an expense ratio of 0.38% while RIGS charges 0.46%. BNDC is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BNDC or RIGS?
Over the past year BNDC returned -2.81% vs -0.44% for RIGS, so RIGS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), BNDC annualized +0.12% vs +0.93% for RIGS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BNDC or RIGS?
BNDC has been the more volatile fund at 5.3% annualized versus 5.0% for RIGS. Worst drawdown: BNDC -23.2% vs RIGS -18.2%.
Should I hold both BNDC and RIGS?
BNDC and RIGS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BNDC or RIGS?
BNDC yields 4.33% while RIGS yields 5.02%, so RIGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RIGS better than BNDC?
BNDC has a lower expense ratio. RIGS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.