BNOV vs MSFO

BNOV vs MSFO

Which is better, BNOV or MSFO?

Each has led over a different period.

BNOV has a lower expense ratio. BNOV led over 1Y, MSFO over 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: BNOVHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBNOVMSFO
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.03%
AUM$201M$87M
Dividend Yield0.00%38.50%
Holdings1830
YTD Return+11.13%Best+10.80%
1Y Return+13.58%Best+4.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.95%+16.27%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.95%-
Volatility (annualized)8.7%Best23.3%
Max Drawdown-13.7%Best-29.6%
$10,000 over 3.1 years$14,622$16,300Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustYieldMax ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionNov 1, 2019Aug 24, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 25, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).

BNOV vs MSFO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare BNOV against instead:BNOV vs SPYBNOV vs QQQBNOV vs VOOBNOV vs VTIMSFO against:MSFO vs VXUS

BNOV vs MSFO Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - November (BNOV) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year BNOV returned +13.58% while MSFO returned +4.00%. Year to date, BNOV is up 11.13% versus a gain of 10.80% for MSFO.

Over three years, BNOV compounded at +13.95% per year against +16.27% for MSFO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MSFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 8.7% for BNOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.7% for BNOV and -29.6% for MSFO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BNOV charges 0.79% per year while MSFO charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $103 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BNOV currently yields 0.00% against 38.50% for MSFO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BNOV and MSFO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BNOVMSFO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BNOV or MSFO?

BNOV has an expense ratio of 0.79% while MSFO charges 1.03%. BNOV is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BNOV or MSFO?

Over the past year BNOV returned +13.58% vs +4.00% for MSFO, so BNOV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BNOV or MSFO?

MSFO has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 8.7% for BNOV. Worst drawdown: BNOV -13.7% vs MSFO -29.6%.

Should I hold both BNOV and MSFO?

BNOV and MSFO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BNOV or MSFO?

BNOV yields 0.00% while MSFO yields 38.50%, so MSFO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MSFO better than BNOV?

BNOV has a lower expense ratio. BNOV led over 1Y, MSFO over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.