BOE vs FDIV
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust vs MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF
Which is better, BOE or FDIV?
BOE has been ahead.
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. BOE led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOE | FDIV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $737M | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.52% | 2.61% |
| Holdings | 169 | 224 |
| YTD Return | +4.03%Best | +1.83% |
| 1Y Return | +7.26%Best | +4.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.72%Best | +6.92% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.10% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 13.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5%Best | -18.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $15,274Best | $11,945 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.7% | 33.0%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | MarketDesk Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 26, 2005 | Sep 19, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Oct 15, 2026 (3.1 years).
BOE vs FDIV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
BOE vs FDIV Performance
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust (BOE) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and MarketDesk Focused US Dividend ETF (FDIV) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices. Over the past year BOE returned +7.26% while FDIV returned +4.47%. Year to date, BOE is up 4.03% versus a gain of 1.83% for FDIV.
Over three years, BOE compounded at +15.72% per year against +6.92% for FDIV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 11.8% for BOE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for BOE and -18.6% for FDIV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOE charges 0.90% per year while FDIV charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $35 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOE currently yields 7.52% against 2.61% for FDIV.
Holdings Overlap
20.5% of BOE's money is in holdings FDIV also owns. 22.0% of FDIV's money is in holdings BOE also owns.
FDIV and BOE share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, BOE as of Jun 30, 2026 and FDIV as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
8 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BOE and 111 in FDIV, against full books of 169 and 224.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 97 positions for FDIV that do not appear in our book for BOE (75.7% of the fund), and 19 for BOE that do not appear in FDIV (35.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BOE | Weight in FDIV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.41% | 4.05% | 0.36% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 3.50% | 3.48% | 0.02% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 3.17% | 0.01% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.47% | 2.93% | 0.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.50% | 3.77% | 2.27% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.88% | 2.94% | 1.06% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 1.94% | 1.37% | 0.57% |
| MTBM&T Bank Corp | 1.63% | 0.28% | 1.35% |
22.0% of FDIV is already inside BOE.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOE or FDIV?
BOE has an expense ratio of 0.90% while FDIV charges 0.35%. FDIV is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BOE or FDIV?
Over the past year BOE returned +7.26% vs +4.47% for FDIV, so BOE leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BOE or FDIV?
FDIV has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 11.8% for BOE. Worst drawdown: BOE -14.5% vs FDIV -18.6%.
Should I hold both BOE and FDIV?
BOE and FDIV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BOE and FDIV?
22.0% of FDIV's money is in holdings BOE also owns. 22.0% of FDIV's is in holdings BOE also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BOE and 111 in FDIV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOE or FDIV?
BOE yields 7.52% while FDIV yields 2.61%, so BOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FDIV better than BOE?
FDIV has a lower expense ratio. BOE led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FDIV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.