BOE vs FFLC
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
Which is better, BOE or FFLC?
FFLC has been ahead.
FFLC has a lower expense ratio. FFLC led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BOE is less concentrated, with 35.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOE | FFLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.38%Best |
| AUM | $737M | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.52% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 169 | 216 |
| YTD Return | +4.82% | +9.90%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.32% | +14.13%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.03% | +22.06%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.46% | +15.97%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2%Best | 15.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.1% | -19.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,330 | $20,976Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.7%Best | 41.9% |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Fidelity Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 26, 2005 | Jun 2, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 4, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.4 years).
BOE vs FFLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
BOE vs FFLC Performance
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust (BOE) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US). Over the past year BOE returned +9.32% while FFLC returned +14.13%. Year to date, BOE is up 4.82% versus a gain of 9.90% for FFLC.
Over three years, BOE compounded at +16.03% per year against +22.06% for FFLC; over five years the annualized figures are +7.46% and +15.97% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FFLC has the edge at +19.16% annualized vs +10.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.2% for BOE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.1% for BOE and -19.7% for FFLC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOE charges 0.90% per year while FFLC charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $38 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOE currently yields 7.52% against 1.01% for FFLC.
Holdings Overlap
40.2% of BOE's money is in holdings FFLC also owns. 36.5% of FFLC's money is in holdings BOE also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 77 days apart, BOE as of Jun 30, 2026 and FFLC as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
15 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BOE and 108 in FFLC, against full books of 169 and 216.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 83 positions for FFLC that do not appear in our book for BOE (59.2% of the fund), and 14 for BOE that do not appear in FFLC (24.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BOE | Weight in FFLC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.41% | 8.82% | 4.41% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.69% | 6.67% | 1.98% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.40% | 4.64% | 1.24% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.17% | 4.44% | 1.27% |
| 2330:TWTsmc | 4.91% | 2.54% | 2.37% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 2.17% | 0.99% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.50% | 3.11% | 1.61% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 2.47% | 0.73% | 1.74% |
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc Common Stock KRW 5000 | 2.11% | 0.67% | 1.44% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 2.06% | 0.70% | 1.36% |
40.2% of BOE is already inside FFLC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOE or FFLC?
BOE has an expense ratio of 0.90% while FFLC charges 0.38%. FFLC is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BOE or FFLC?
Over the past year BOE returned +9.32% vs +14.13% for FFLC, so FFLC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BOE annualized +10.32% vs +19.16% for FFLC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BOE or FFLC?
FFLC has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.2% for BOE. Worst drawdown: BOE -26.1% vs FFLC -19.7%.
Should I hold both BOE and FFLC?
BOE and FFLC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BOE and FFLC?
40.2% of BOE's money is in holdings FFLC also owns. 36.5% of FFLC's is in holdings BOE also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BOE and 108 in FFLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOE or FFLC?
BOE yields 7.52% while FFLC yields 1.01%, so BOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFLC better than BOE?
FFLC has a lower expense ratio. FFLC led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BOE is less concentrated, with 35.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.