BOE vs LSVD
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust vs LSV Disciplined Value ETF
Which is better, BOE or LSVD?
LSVD has been ahead.
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BOE | LSVD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.40%Best |
| AUM | $737M | $678M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.52% | 0.27% |
| Holdings | 169 | 136 |
| YTD Return | +4.82% | +20.92%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.32% | +30.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.03% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.46% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 13.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,455 | $14,810Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.7% | 35.0%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | LSV Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 26, 2005 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
BOE vs LSVD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
BOE vs LSVD Performance
BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust (BOE) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management. Over the past year BOE returned +9.32% while LSVD returned +30.07%. Year to date, BOE is up 4.82% versus a gain of 20.92% for LSVD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 12.3% for BOE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for BOE and -19.3% for LSVD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BOE charges 0.90% per year while LSVD charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $40 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BOE currently yields 7.52% against 0.27% for LSVD.
Holdings Overlap
27.9% of BOE's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 26.2% of LSVD's money is in holdings BOE also owns.
BOE and LSVD share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, BOE as of Jun 30, 2026 and LSVD as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
9 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BOE and 135 in LSVD, against full books of 169 and 136.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 124 positions for LSVD that do not appear in our book for BOE (73.5% of the fund), and 18 for BOE that do not appear in LSVD (28.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BOE | Weight in LSVD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.41% | 6.81% | 2.40% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.17% | 5.62% | 2.45% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.69% | 3.61% | 1.08% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.40% | 3.33% | 0.07% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 3.50% | 1.90% | 1.60% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.50% | 2.80% | 1.30% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 1.07% | 2.09% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.45% | 0.69% | 1.76% |
| CFGCitizens Financial Group Inc. | 1.67% | 0.36% | 1.31% |
27.9% of BOE is already inside LSVD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BOE or LSVD?
BOE has an expense ratio of 0.90% while LSVD charges 0.40%. LSVD is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BOE or LSVD?
Over the past year BOE returned +9.32% vs +30.07% for LSVD, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BOE annualized +12.97% vs +24.38% for LSVD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BOE or LSVD?
LSVD has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 12.3% for BOE. Worst drawdown: BOE -14.5% vs LSVD -19.3%.
Should I hold both BOE and LSVD?
BOE and LSVD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BOE and LSVD?
27.9% of BOE's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 26.2% of LSVD's is in holdings BOE also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BOE and 135 in LSVD.
Which pays a higher dividend, BOE or LSVD?
BOE yields 7.52% while LSVD yields 0.27%, so BOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSVD better than BOE?
LSVD has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.