BRKD vs PLTD

BRKD vs PLTD

Which is better, BRKD or PLTD?

BRKD has been ahead.

PLTD has a lower expense ratio. BRKD led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: PLTDHigher Returns: BRKD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBRKDPLTD
Expense Ratio1.00%0.98%Best
AUM$1M$31M
Dividend Yield2.82%3.86%
Holdings715
Volatility (annualized)16.8%Best46.5%
Max Drawdown-17.9%Best-77.2%
$10,000 over 1.3 years$10,083Best$3,740
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustDirexion Shares ETF Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityTrading-Inverse Equity
InceptionDec 11, 2024Dec 11, 2024

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 187 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BRKD has data through Apr 10, 2026 and PLTD through Oct 14, 2026.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 11, 2024 to Apr 10, 2026 (1.3 years).

Compare BRKD against instead:BRKD vs SPYBRKD vs QQQBRKD vs VOOBRKD vs VTIPLTD against:PLTD vs VXUS

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PLTD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 46.5% compared with 16.8% for BRKD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for BRKD and -77.2% for PLTD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BRKD charges 1.00% per year while PLTD charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $98 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRKD currently yields 2.82% against 3.86% for PLTD.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 3 holdings in BRKD and 3 in PLTD, totalling 99.9% and 90.5% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.

The two holdings books were reported 248 days apart, BRKD as of Jan 30, 2026 and PLTD as of Oct 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

2 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in BRKD and 3 in PLTD, against full books of 7 and 15.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BRKDWeight in PLTDDifference
DGCXXDreyfus Government Cash Management 28969.02%73.75%4.73%
DIRXXDreyfus Trsry Securities Cash Mgmt11.64%10.85%0.79%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BRKD and PLTD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BRKDPLTD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BRKD or PLTD?

BRKD has an expense ratio of 1.00% while PLTD charges 0.98%. PLTD is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which is riskier, BRKD or PLTD?

PLTD has been the more volatile fund at 46.5% annualized versus 16.8% for BRKD. Worst drawdown: BRKD -17.9% vs PLTD -77.2%.

Should I hold both BRKD and PLTD?

BRKD and PLTD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BRKD or PLTD?

BRKD yields 2.82% while PLTD yields 3.86%, so PLTD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PLTD better than BRKD?

PLTD has a lower expense ratio. BRKD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.