BRKU vs TARK
Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X ETF vs Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
Which is better, BRKU or TARK?
Each has led over a different period.
BRKU has a lower expense ratio. BRKU led over 1Y, TARK over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BRKU | TARK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02%Best | 1.48% |
| AUM | $41M | $585,773.74 |
| Dividend Yield | 2.49% | 26.41% |
| Holdings | 18 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +2.86%Best | -3.65% |
| 1Y Return | +0.47%Best | -25.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +32.73% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.4%Best | 75.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0%Best | -65.5% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $10,306 | $11,651Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Tradr ETFs |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | Apr 28, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 11, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
BRKU vs TARK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
BRKU vs TARK Performance
Direxion Daily BRKB Bull 2X ETF (BRKU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year BRKU returned +0.47% while TARK returned -25.61%. Year to date, BRKU is up 2.86% versus a loss of 3.65% for TARK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 75.9% compared with 31.4% for BRKU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for BRKU and -65.5% for TARK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BRKU charges 1.02% per year while TARK charges 1.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $148 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRKU currently yields 2.49% against 26.41% for TARK.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BRKU and TARK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BRKU or TARK?
BRKU has an expense ratio of 1.02% while TARK charges 1.48%. BRKU is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BRKU or TARK?
Over the past year BRKU returned +0.47% vs -25.61% for TARK, so BRKU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BRKU annualized +1.69% vs +8.86% for TARK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BRKU or TARK?
TARK has been the more volatile fund at 75.9% annualized versus 31.4% for BRKU. Worst drawdown: BRKU -35.0% vs TARK -65.5%.
Should I hold both BRKU and TARK?
BRKU and TARK have a monthly-return correlation of -0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BRKU or TARK?
BRKU yields 2.49% while TARK yields 26.41%, so TARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TARK better than BRKU?
BRKU has a lower expense ratio. BRKU led over 1Y, TARK over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.