BROL vs CGGR
Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Which is better, BROL or CGGR?
CGGR costs less.
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BROL | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | - | $26.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 129 | 97 |
| YTD Return | +4.42% | +6.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +8.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.14% |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.8% | 40.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | Capital Group (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 25, 2026 | Feb 22, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BROL vs CGGR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BROL vs CGGR Performance
Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF (BROL) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Year to date, BROL is up 4.42% versus a gain of 6.35% for CGGR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BROL charges 0.45% per year while CGGR charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $39 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BROL currently yields 0.00% against 0.15% for CGGR.
Holdings Overlap
64.1% of BROL's money is in holdings CGGR also owns. 51.5% of CGGR's money is in holdings BROL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
25 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in BROL and 96 in CGGR, against full books of 129 and 97.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 61 positions for CGGR that do not appear in our book for BROL (43.9% of the fund), and 33 for BROL that do not appear in CGGR (27.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BROL | Weight in CGGR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.06% | 5.07% | 3.99% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 6.76% | 3.24% | 3.52% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.84% | 2.53% | 4.31% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.71% | 4.43% | 1.72% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.23% | 2.38% | 1.85% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.75% | 4.66% | 2.91% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.40% | 3.88% | 1.48% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.75% | 4.17% | 2.42% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.84% | 3.13% | 1.29% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.78% | 2.10% | 0.68% |
64.1% of BROL is already inside CGGR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BROL or CGGR?
BROL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while CGGR charges 0.39%. CGGR is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BROL and CGGR?
64.1% of BROL's money is in holdings CGGR also owns. 51.5% of CGGR's is in holdings BROL also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in BROL and 96 in CGGR.
Which pays a higher dividend, BROL or CGGR?
BROL yields 0.00% while CGGR yields 0.15%, so CGGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CGGR better than BROL?
CGGR has a lower expense ratio. CGGR is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.