BROL vs GQGU
Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF vs GQG US Equity ETF
Which is better, BROL or GQGU?
BROL costs less.
BROL has a lower expense ratio. BROL is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BROL | GQGU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | - | $584M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 129 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +4.42% | +5.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +3.28% |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.8%Best | 57.2% |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | GQG Partners LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 25, 2026 | Jul 31, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BROL vs GQGU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BROL vs GQGU Performance
Baron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETF (BROL) is an ETF from Baron Funds and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC. Year to date, BROL is up 4.42% versus a gain of 5.40% for GQGU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BROL charges 0.45% per year while GQGU charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $49 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BROL currently yields 0.00% against 0.95% for GQGU.
Holdings Overlap
42.9% of BROL's money is in holdings GQGU also owns. 58.6% of GQGU's money is in holdings BROL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in BROL and 38 in GQGU, against full books of 129 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 22 positions for GQGU that do not appear in our book for BROL (39.6% of the fund), and 41 for BROL that do not appear in GQGU (46.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BROL | Weight in GQGU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.06% | 9.37% | 0.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.84% | 7.83% | 0.99% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 6.76% | 7.25% | 0.49% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.23% | 6.76% | 2.53% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.75% | 8.16% | 6.41% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.40% | 4.08% | 1.68% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.71% | 2.56% | 0.15% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.78% | 1.93% | 0.85% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 0.88% | 3.12% | 2.24% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.04% | 2.10% | 1.06% |
58.6% of GQGU is already inside BROL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BROL or GQGU?
BROL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while GQGU charges 0.49%. BROL is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BROL and GQGU?
58.6% of GQGU's money is in holdings BROL also owns. 58.6% of GQGU's is in holdings BROL also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in BROL and 38 in GQGU.
Which pays a higher dividend, BROL or GQGU?
BROL yields 0.00% while GQGU yields 0.95%, so GQGU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GQGU better than BROL?
BROL has a lower expense ratio. BROL is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.