BSCQ vs BSCS
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF
Which is better, BSCQ or BSCS?
Each has led over a different period.
BSCQ led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, BSCS over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCQ | BSCS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10%Tie | 0.10%Tie |
| AUM | $3.2B | $3.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.04% | 4.47% |
| Holdings | 256 | 971 |
| YTD Return | +2.94%Best | +1.26% |
| 1Y Return | +3.90%Best | +2.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.51% | +6.13%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.77%Best | +1.33% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.7%Best | 6.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5%Best | -18.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,917Best | $10,683 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Long Term Mid Quality | Long Term Mid Quality |
| Inception | Sep 13, 2016 | Aug 9, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 9, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.2 years).
BSCQ vs BSCS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.2 years both funds cover.
BSCQ vs BSCS Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSCQ returned +3.90% while BSCS returned +2.24%. Year to date, BSCQ is up 2.94% versus a gain of 1.26% for BSCS.
Over three years, BSCQ compounded at +5.51% per year against +6.13% for BSCS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.77% and +1.33% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, BSCQ has the edge at +2.82% annualized vs +2.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSCS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.5% compared with 4.7% for BSCQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for BSCQ and -18.4% for BSCS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCQ charges 0.10% per year while BSCS charges 0.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $10 annually. On income, BSCQ currently yields 4.04% against 4.47% for BSCS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 55.8% of BSCQ's money is in holdings BSCS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BSCS, our book for it covers 84.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
1 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in BSCQ and 415 in BSCS, against full books of 256 and 971.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSCQ | Weight in BSCS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGPXXInvesco Government & Agency Portfolio, Institutional Class | 55.80% | 0.01% | 55.79% |
55.8% of BSCQ is already inside BSCS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCQ or BSCS?
BSCQ has an expense ratio of 0.10% while BSCS charges 0.10%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, BSCQ or BSCS?
Over the past year BSCQ returned +3.90% vs +2.24% for BSCS, so BSCQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BSCQ annualized +2.82% vs +2.68% for BSCS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSCQ or BSCS?
BSCS has been the more volatile fund at 6.5% annualized versus 4.7% for BSCQ. Worst drawdown: BSCQ -16.5% vs BSCS -18.4%.
Should I hold both BSCQ and BSCS?
BSCQ and BSCS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCQ and BSCS?
At least 55.8% of BSCQ's money is in holdings BSCS also owns. Our book for BSCS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 82 positions we hold weights for in BSCQ and 415 in BSCS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCQ or BSCS?
BSCQ yields 4.04% while BSCS yields 4.47%, so BSCS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BSCS better than BSCQ?
BSCQ led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, BSCS over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.