BSCU vs FLCB
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF vs Franklin US Core Bond ETF
Which is better, BSCU or FLCB?
Nearly the same fund. BSCU costs less.
BSCU has a lower expense ratio. BSCU led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCU | FLCB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10%Best | 0.15% |
| AUM | $2.8B | $3.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.71% | 4.50% |
| Holdings | 901 | 642 |
| YTD Return | -0.80%Best | -2.14% |
| 1Y Return | -0.09%Best | -2.11% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.31%Best | +4.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.34%Best | -0.62% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.3% | 5.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -19.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,171Best | $9,694 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | Sep 17, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 17, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.1 years).
BSCU vs FLCB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.1 years both funds cover.
BSCU vs FLCB Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Franklin US Core Bond ETF (FLCB) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year BSCU returned -0.09% while FLCB returned -2.11%. Year to date, BSCU is down 0.80% versus a loss of 2.14% for FLCB.
Over three years, BSCU compounded at +6.31% per year against +4.58% for FLCB; over five years the annualized figures are +0.34% and -0.62% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, BSCU has the edge at +0.10% annualized vs -0.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.3% compared with 5.9% for FLCB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for BSCU and -19.5% for FLCB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCU charges 0.10% per year while FLCB charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $15 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCU currently yields 4.71% against 4.50% for FLCB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 401 holdings in BSCU and 342 in FLCB, totalling 87.6% and 61.0% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 13 positions appear in both.
13 positions in common, counted across the 401 positions we hold weights for in BSCU and 342 in FLCB, against full books of 901 and 642.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSCU | Weight in FLCB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| REGN 1.75 09/15/30Nysgen 0.000 06/01/55 | 0.30% | 0.20% | 0.10% |
| ET 6.4 12/01/30Energy Transfer Lp Regd 6.40000000 | 0.28% | 0.17% | 0.11% |
| VICI 4.95 02/15/30Vici Properties Lp 4.95 02/15/2030 | 0.26% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
| UNH 2 05/15/30Unitedhealth Group Inc 2 05/15/2030 | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.22% |
| FI 2.65 06/01/30Fiserv Inc 2.65 Jun 01, 2030 | 0.25% | 0.12% | 0.13% |
| RPRX 2.2 09/02/30Royalty Pharma Plc 2.2 09/02/2030 | 0.24% | 0.13% | 0.11% |
| DUK 2.45 06/01/30Duke Energy Corp 2.45 6/1/2030 | 0.21% | 0.10% | 0.11% |
| NVR 3 05/15/30Nvr, Inc., 3.0%, 5/15/2030 | 0.23% | 0.07% | 0.16% |
| MRVL 4.75 07/15/30Marvell Technology Inc 4.75% Jul 15, 2030 | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.04% |
| CNQCN 2.95 07/15/30Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 2.95 Jul 15, 2030 | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSCU and FLCB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCU or FLCB?
BSCU has an expense ratio of 0.10% while FLCB charges 0.15%. BSCU is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSCU or FLCB?
Over the past year BSCU returned -0.09% vs -2.11% for FLCB, so BSCU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BSCU annualized +0.10% vs -0.90% for FLCB. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSCU or FLCB?
BSCU has been the more volatile fund at 7.3% annualized versus 5.9% for FLCB. Worst drawdown: BSCU -22.5% vs FLCB -19.5%.
Should I hold both BSCU and FLCB?
BSCU and FLCB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCU or FLCB?
BSCU yields 4.71% while FLCB yields 4.50%, so BSCU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLCB better than BSCU?
BSCU has a lower expense ratio. BSCU led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.