BSCU vs GBND
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
Which is better, BSCU or GBND?
Nearly the same fund. BSCU costs less.
BSCU has a lower expense ratio. BSCU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCU | GBND |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10%Best | 0.25% |
| AUM | $2.8B | $601M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.71% | 4.01% |
| Holdings | 901 | 747 |
| YTD Return | -0.80%Best | -2.40% |
| 1Y Return | -0.09%Best | -2.18% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.31% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.34% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.6%Best | 4.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -2.6%Best | -4.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,248Best | $10,090 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Goldman Sachs Asset Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | Jun 24, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BSCU vs GBND growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BSCU vs GBND Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF (GBND) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Over the past year BSCU returned -0.09% while GBND returned -2.18%. Year to date, BSCU is down 0.80% versus a loss of 2.40% for GBND.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GBND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.0% compared with 2.6% for BSCU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.6% for BSCU and -4.9% for GBND. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCU charges 0.10% per year while GBND charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $25 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCU currently yields 4.71% against 4.01% for GBND.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 401 holdings in BSCU and 480 in GBND, totalling 87.6% and 52.2% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 15 positions appear in both.
15 positions in common, counted across the 401 positions we hold weights for in BSCU and 480 in GBND, against full books of 901 and 747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSCU | Weight in GBND | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BA 5.15 05/01/30The Boeing Co 5.150 May 01 30 | 1.23% | 0.01% | 1.22% |
| SNPS 4.85 04/01/30Synopsys Inc 4.85% | 0.54% | 0.02% | 0.52% |
| RRX 6.3 02/15/30 *Regal Rexnord Corp 6.3 15/02/2030 | 0.30% | 0.02% | 0.28% |
| LOW 1.7 10/15/30Lowes Companies Inc 1.7% Oct 15, 2030 | 0.29% | 0.03% | 0.26% |
| DAL 5.25 07/10/30Delta Air Lines Inc 5.25 07/10/2030 | 0.27% | 0.01% | 0.26% |
| NEE 5.05 03/15/30Nextera Energy Capital Holdings Inc 5.05 03/15/2030 | 0.27% | 0.01% | 0.26% |
| ORCL 4.65 05/06/30Oracle Corp Regd 4.65000000 | 0.20% | 0.01% | 0.19% |
| HST 3.5 09/15/30 IHost Hotels + Resorts Lp Sr Unsecured 09/30 3.5 | 0.19% | 0.01% | 0.18% |
| CFG 3.25 04/30/30Citizens Financial Group Inc 3.25 Apr 30, 2030 | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| LVS 6 06/14/30Las Vegas Sands 6% 06/30 | 0.14% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSCU and GBND you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCU or GBND?
BSCU has an expense ratio of 0.10% while GBND charges 0.25%. BSCU is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSCU or GBND?
Over the past year BSCU returned -0.09% vs -2.18% for GBND, so BSCU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BSCU annualized +1.90% vs +0.69% for GBND. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSCU or GBND?
GBND has been the more volatile fund at 4.0% annualized versus 2.6% for BSCU. Worst drawdown: BSCU -2.6% vs GBND -4.9%.
Should I hold both BSCU and GBND?
BSCU and GBND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCU or GBND?
BSCU yields 4.71% while GBND yields 4.01%, so BSCU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GBND better than BSCU?
BSCU has a lower expense ratio. BSCU led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.