BSCU vs PTRB
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF vs PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
Which is better, BSCU or PTRB?
Nearly the same fund. BSCU costs less.
BSCU has a lower expense ratio. BSCU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCU | PTRB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $2.8B | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.71% | 5.75% |
| Holdings | 901 | 2,659 |
| YTD Return | -0.80%Best | -2.27% |
| 1Y Return | -0.09%Best | -2.12% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.31%Best | +5.15% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.34% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 7.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.2% | -19.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $10,242Best | $9,847 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | Dec 2, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.8 years).
BSCU vs PTRB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
BSCU vs PTRB Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year BSCU returned -0.09% while PTRB returned -2.12%. Year to date, BSCU is down 0.80% versus a loss of 2.27% for PTRB.
Over three years, BSCU compounded at +6.31% per year against +5.15% for PTRB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.8% compared with 7.1% for PTRB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.2% for BSCU and -19.2% for PTRB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCU charges 0.10% per year while PTRB charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $49 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCU currently yields 4.71% against 5.75% for PTRB.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 401 holdings in BSCU and 675 in PTRB, totalling 87.6% and 52.1% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 15 positions appear in both.
15 positions in common, counted across the 401 positions we hold weights for in BSCU and 675 in PTRB, against full books of 901 and 2,659.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSCU | Weight in PTRB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PM 5.125 02/15/30Philip Morris International Inc 5.13% 02/15/2030 | 0.59% | 0.04% | 0.55% |
| AVGO 4.35 02/15/30Broadcom Inc 4.35% 02/15/30 | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.39% |
| UBER 4.3 01/15/30Uber Technologies Inc 4.3% | 0.33% | 0.06% | 0.27% |
| WMB 3.5 11/15/30Williams Companies Inc 3.5 Nov 15, 2030 | 0.25% | 0.10% | 0.15% |
| CVS 1.75 08/21/30Cvs Health Corp 1.75 Aug 21, 2030 | 0.29% | 0.02% | 0.27% |
| PM 4.375 04/30/30Philip Morris International Inc 4.375 04/30/2030 | 0.20% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| BATSLN 6.343 08/02/3Bat Capital Corp 6.34 08/02/2030 | 0.28% | 0.01% | 0.27% |
| OKE 5.8 11/01/30Oneok Inc 5.8 11/01/2030 | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.01% |
| ET 6.4 12/01/30Energy Transfer Lp Regd 6.40000000 | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
| WES 4.05 02/01/30Western Midstream Operating Lp 4.050 02/01/2030 | 0.27% | 0.01% | 0.26% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSCU and PTRB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCU or PTRB?
BSCU has an expense ratio of 0.10% while PTRB charges 0.49%. BSCU is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSCU or PTRB?
Over the past year BSCU returned -0.09% vs -2.12% for PTRB, so BSCU leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSCU or PTRB?
BSCU has been the more volatile fund at 7.8% annualized versus 7.1% for PTRB. Worst drawdown: BSCU -20.2% vs PTRB -19.2%.
Should I hold both BSCU and PTRB?
BSCU and PTRB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCU or PTRB?
BSCU yields 4.71% while PTRB yields 5.75%, so PTRB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PTRB better than BSCU?
BSCU has a lower expense ratio. BSCU led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.