BSJP vs BSJV
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Which is better, BSJP or BSJV?
BSJV costs less.
BSJV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJP | BSJV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43% | 0.42%Best |
| AUM | $538M | $128M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.53% | 6.86% |
| Holdings | 9 | 494 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.6%Best | 6.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.6%Best | -8.0% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2017 | Sep 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Price Return, 1Y Price Return, 3Y Price Return (annualized), 5Y Price Return (annualized), $10,000 over 2.2 years, Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 301 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BSJP has data through Dec 17, 2025 and BSJV through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 20, 2023 to Dec 17, 2025 (2.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSJV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.2% compared with 1.6% for BSJP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for BSJP and -8.0% for BSJV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJP charges 0.43% per year while BSJV charges 0.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $42 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJP currently yields 4.53% against 6.86% for BSJV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 8 holdings in BSJP and 148 in BSJV, totalling 100.0% and 54.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 382 days apart, BSJP as of Aug 29, 2025 and BSJV as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in BSJP and 148 in BSJV, against full books of 9 and 494.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSJP and BSJV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJP or BSJV?
BSJP has an expense ratio of 0.43% while BSJV charges 0.42%. BSJV is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BSJP or BSJV?
BSJV has been the more volatile fund at 6.2% annualized versus 1.6% for BSJP. Worst drawdown: BSJP -1.6% vs BSJV -8.0%.
Should I hold both BSJP and BSJV?
BSJP and BSJV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJP or BSJV?
BSJP yields 4.53% while BSJV yields 6.86%, so BSJV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BSJV better than BSJP?
BSJV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.