BSJQ vs BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Which is better, BSJQ or BSJS?
Nearly the same fund. BSJS costs less.
BSJS has a lower expense ratio. BSJQ led over 5Y and the full window, BSJS over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJQ | BSJS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43% | 0.42%Best |
| AUM | $715M | $776M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.43% | 6.15% |
| Holdings | 46 | 349 |
| YTD Return | +1.77% | +2.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.80% | +3.71%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.77% | +8.69%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.63%Best | +3.13% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.2%Best | 7.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.9%Best | -17.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,952Best | $11,666 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2018 | Sep 16, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.1 years).
BSJQ vs BSJS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.1 years both funds cover.
BSJQ vs BSJS Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSJQ returned +2.80% while BSJS returned +3.71%. Year to date, BSJQ is up 1.77% versus a gain of 2.24% for BSJS.
Over three years, BSJQ compounded at +6.77% per year against +8.69% for BSJS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.63% and +3.13% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, BSJQ has the edge at +4.05% annualized vs +3.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSJS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.2% compared with 5.2% for BSJQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.9% for BSJQ and -17.7% for BSJS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJQ charges 0.43% per year while BSJS charges 0.42%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $42 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJQ currently yields 5.43% against 6.15% for BSJS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 76.8% of BSJQ's money is in holdings BSJS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BSJS, our book for it covers 92.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of BSJQ is already inside BSJS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
1 positions in common, counted across the 13 positions we hold weights for in BSJQ and 155 in BSJS, against full books of 46 and 349.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSJQ | Weight in BSJS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGPXXInvesco Government & Agency Portfolio, Institutional Class | 76.81% | 0.92% | 75.89% |
76.8% of BSJQ is already inside BSJS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJQ or BSJS?
BSJQ has an expense ratio of 0.43% while BSJS charges 0.42%. BSJS is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSJQ or BSJS?
Over the past year BSJQ returned +2.80% vs +3.71% for BSJS, so BSJS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BSJQ annualized +4.05% vs +3.40% for BSJS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSJQ or BSJS?
BSJS has been the more volatile fund at 7.2% annualized versus 5.2% for BSJQ. Worst drawdown: BSJQ -11.9% vs BSJS -17.7%.
Should I hold both BSJQ and BSJS?
BSJQ and BSJS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJQ and BSJS?
At least 76.8% of BSJQ's money is in holdings BSJS also owns. Our book for BSJS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 13 positions we hold weights for in BSJQ and 155 in BSJS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJQ or BSJS?
BSJQ yields 5.43% while BSJS yields 6.15%, so BSJS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BSJS better than BSJQ?
BSJS has a lower expense ratio. BSJQ led over 5Y and the full window, BSJS over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.