BSJQ vs GTOH
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF
Which is better, BSJQ or GTOH?
BSJQ has been ahead.
BSJQ has a lower expense ratio. BSJQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJQ | GTOH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43%Best | 0.48% |
| AUM | $715M | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.43% | 5.78% |
| Holdings | 46 | 397 |
| YTD Return | +1.77%Best | -4.05% |
| 1Y Return | +2.80% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.77% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.63% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2018 | Dec 9, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BSJQ vs GTOH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BSJQ vs GTOH Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BSJQ is up 1.77% versus a loss of 4.05% for GTOH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJQ charges 0.43% per year while GTOH charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $48 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJQ currently yields 5.43% against 5.78% for GTOH.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.6% of BSJQ's money is in holdings GTOH also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GTOH, our book for it covers 73.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 13 positions we hold weights for in BSJQ and 131 in GTOH, against full books of 46 and 397.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSJQ | Weight in GTOH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CWK 8.875 09/01/31 1Cushman And Wakefield U.S. Borrower Llc. | 0.57% | 0.55% | 0.02% |
| GRSTAR 7.75 09/01/30Greystar Real Estate Par 7.75 09-01-2030 | 0.06% | 0.52% | 0.46% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSJQ and GTOH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJQ or GTOH?
BSJQ has an expense ratio of 0.43% while GTOH charges 0.48%. BSJQ is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJQ or GTOH?
BSJQ yields 5.43% while GTOH yields 5.78%, so GTOH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GTOH better than BSJQ?
BSJQ has a lower expense ratio. BSJQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.