BSJQ vs RSF
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc.
Which is better, BSJQ or RSF?
Each has led over a different period.
BSJQ has a lower expense ratio. BSJQ led over the full window, RSF over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJQ | RSF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43%Best | 5.25% |
| AUM | $715M | $49M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.43% | 11.07% |
| Holdings | 46 | 9,552 |
| YTD Return | +1.77% | +7.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.80% | +7.39%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.77% | +8.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.63% | +3.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.6%Best | 9.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.0%Best | -38.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,952 | $11,980Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | RiverNorth |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2018 | Sep 22, 2016 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 9, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.2 years).
BSJQ vs RSF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.2 years both funds cover.
BSJQ vs RSF Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc. (RSF) is an ETF from RiverNorth. Over the past year BSJQ returned +2.80% while RSF returned +7.39%. Year to date, BSJQ is up 1.77% versus a gain of 7.42% for RSF.
Over three years, BSJQ compounded at +6.77% per year against +8.18% for RSF; over five years the annualized figures are +3.63% and +3.68% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, BSJQ has the edge at +2.88% annualized vs +1.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.1% compared with 7.6% for BSJQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.0% for BSJQ and -38.8% for RSF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJQ charges 0.43% per year while RSF charges 5.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $525 annually, a gap of $482 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJQ currently yields 5.43% against 11.07% for RSF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 13 holdings in BSJQ and 15 in RSF, totalling 95.7% and 5.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 96 days apart, BSJQ as of Oct 4, 2026 and RSF as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 13 positions we hold weights for in BSJQ and 15 in RSF, against full books of 46 and 9,552.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSJQ and RSF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJQ or RSF?
BSJQ has an expense ratio of 0.43% while RSF charges 5.25%. BSJQ is the cheaper option, by $482 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSJQ or RSF?
Over the past year BSJQ returned +2.80% vs +7.39% for RSF, so RSF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BSJQ annualized +2.88% vs +1.10% for RSF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSJQ or RSF?
RSF has been the more volatile fund at 9.1% annualized versus 7.6% for BSJQ. Worst drawdown: BSJQ -25.0% vs RSF -38.8%.
Should I hold both BSJQ and RSF?
BSJQ and RSF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJQ or RSF?
BSJQ yields 5.43% while RSF yields 11.07%, so RSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSF better than BSJQ?
BSJQ has a lower expense ratio. BSJQ led over the full window, RSF over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.