BSJR vs IHYF
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco High Yield Bond Factor ETF
Which is better, BSJR or IHYF?
Nearly the same fund. IHYF costs less.
IHYF has a lower expense ratio. IHYF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. IHYF is less concentrated, with 6.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJR | IHYF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $945M | $134M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.51% | 6.50% |
| Holdings | 193 | 432 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.2% | 6.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4%Best | -36.0% |
| $10,000 over 5.2 years | $11,965 | $12,361Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.9% | 6.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2019 | Nov 30, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 236 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BSJR has data through Oct 14, 2026 and IHYF through Feb 20, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2020 to Feb 20, 2026 (5.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSJR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.2% compared with 6.9% for IHYF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for BSJR and -36.0% for IHYF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJR charges 0.42% per year while IHYF charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $39 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJR currently yields 5.51% against 6.50% for IHYF.
Holdings Overlap
47.0% of BSJR's money is in holdings IHYF also owns. 9.3% of IHYF's money is in holdings BSJR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 369 days apart, BSJR as of Oct 4, 2026 and IHYF as of Sep 30, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
34 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in BSJR and 396 in IHYF, against full books of 193 and 432.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 357 positions for IHYF that do not appear in our book for BSJR (86.6% of the fund), and 50 for BSJR that do not appear in IHYF (49.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSJR | Weight in IHYF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGPXXInvesco Government & Agency Portfolio, Institutional Class | 4.82% | 0.46% | 4.36% |
| VENLNG 9.875 02/01/3Venture Global 9.875% 02/01/32 | 3.74% | 0.32% | 3.42% |
| RAKUTN 11.25 02/15/2Rakuten Group Inc 144A 11.25% Feb 15, 2027 | 3.26% | 0.21% | 3.05% |
| CYH 10.875 01/15/32 | 2.86% | 0.41% | 2.45% |
| IEP 5.25 05/15/27Icahn Enterprises L P / Icahn Sr Nt 5.25 2027-05-15 | 2.41% | 0.13% | 2.28% |
| SIRI 5 08/01/27 144ASirius Xm Radio Inc Company Guar 144a 08/27 5 | 2.17% | 0.24% | 1.93% |
| CHTR 5.125 05/01/27 | 1.77% | 0.50% | 1.27% |
| IRM 4.875 09/15/27 1Iron Mountain Inc | 1.73% | 0.44% | 1.29% |
| PRSESE 3.375 08/31/2Corp. Note | 1.67% | 0.47% | 1.20% |
| MPW 5 10/15/27Mpt Oper Partnership Lp/corp 5% 10/15/2027 | 1.99% | 0.14% | 1.85% |
47.0% of BSJR is already inside IHYF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJR or IHYF?
BSJR has an expense ratio of 0.42% while IHYF charges 0.39%. IHYF is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BSJR or IHYF?
BSJR has been the more volatile fund at 7.2% annualized versus 6.9% for IHYF. Worst drawdown: BSJR -16.4% vs IHYF -36.0%.
Should I hold both BSJR and IHYF?
BSJR and IHYF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJR and IHYF?
47.0% of BSJR's money is in holdings IHYF also owns. 9.3% of IHYF's is in holdings BSJR also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in BSJR and 396 in IHYF.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJR or IHYF?
BSJR yields 5.51% while IHYF yields 6.50%, so IHYF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IHYF better than BSJR?
IHYF has a lower expense ratio. IHYF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. IHYF is less concentrated, with 6.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.