BSJR vs RSF
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc.
Which is better, BSJR or RSF?
RSF has been ahead.
BSJR has a lower expense ratio. RSF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJR | RSF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42%Best | 5.25% |
| AUM | $945M | $49M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.51% | 11.07% |
| Holdings | 193 | 9,552 |
| YTD Return | +2.10% | +7.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.18% | +7.39%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.94% | +8.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.25% | +3.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.7% | 8.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3%Best | -25.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,734 | $11,980Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | RiverNorth |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2019 | Sep 22, 2016 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.1 years).
BSJR vs RSF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.1 years both funds cover.
BSJR vs RSF Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc. (RSF) is an ETF from RiverNorth. Over the past year BSJR returned +3.18% while RSF returned +7.39%. Year to date, BSJR is up 2.10% versus a gain of 7.42% for RSF.
Over three years, BSJR compounded at +7.94% per year against +8.18% for RSF; over five years the annualized figures are +3.25% and +3.68% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, RSF has the edge at +4.43% annualized vs +3.00%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSJR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.7% compared with 8.4% for RSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for BSJR and -25.7% for RSF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJR charges 0.42% per year while RSF charges 5.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $525 annually, a gap of $483 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJR currently yields 5.51% against 11.07% for RSF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 88 holdings in BSJR and 15 in RSF, totalling 96.8% and 5.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 96 days apart, BSJR as of Oct 4, 2026 and RSF as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in BSJR and 15 in RSF, against full books of 193 and 9,552.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSJR and RSF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJR or RSF?
BSJR has an expense ratio of 0.42% while RSF charges 5.25%. BSJR is the cheaper option, by $483 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSJR or RSF?
Over the past year BSJR returned +3.18% vs +7.39% for RSF, so RSF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BSJR annualized +3.00% vs +4.43% for RSF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSJR or RSF?
BSJR has been the more volatile fund at 8.7% annualized versus 8.4% for RSF. Worst drawdown: BSJR -23.3% vs RSF -25.7%.
Should I hold both BSJR and RSF?
BSJR and RSF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJR or RSF?
BSJR yields 5.51% while RSF yields 11.07%, so RSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSF better than BSJR?
BSJR has a lower expense ratio. RSF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.