BSJS vs GTOH
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF
Which is better, BSJS or GTOH?
BSJS has been ahead.
BSJS has a lower expense ratio. BSJS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJS | GTOH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42%Best | 0.48% |
| AUM | $776M | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.15% | 5.78% |
| Holdings | 349 | 397 |
| YTD Return | +2.24%Best | -4.05% |
| 1Y Return | +3.71% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.69% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.13% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | Dec 9, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BSJS vs GTOH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BSJS vs GTOH Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BSJS is up 2.24% versus a loss of 4.05% for GTOH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJS charges 0.42% per year while GTOH charges 0.48%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $48 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJS currently yields 6.15% against 5.78% for GTOH.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 155 holdings in BSJS and 131 in GTOH, totalling 92.9% and 73.7% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 5 positions appear in both.
5 positions in common, counted across the 155 positions we hold weights for in BSJS and 131 in GTOH, against full books of 349 and 397.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSJS | Weight in GTOH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NXST 4.75 11/01/28 1Nexstar Broadcasting Inc Sr Unsecured 144a 11/28 4.75 | 0.98% | 0.52% | 0.46% |
| CCO 7.5 03/15/33 144Clear Channel Outdoor Ho 7.50 2033-03-15 | 0.91% | 0.18% | 0.73% |
| EZPW 7.375 04/01/32 | 0.30% | 0.72% | 0.42% |
| CVI 5.75 02/15/28 14Cvr Energy Inc. 5.75% 2/15/2028 | 0.18% | 0.47% | 0.29% |
| NAVI 4.875 03/15/28Navient, 4.875% 15Mar2028, USD | 0.47% | 0.12% | 0.35% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSJS and GTOH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJS or GTOH?
BSJS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while GTOH charges 0.48%. BSJS is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJS or GTOH?
BSJS yields 6.15% while GTOH yields 5.78%, so BSJS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GTOH better than BSJS?
BSJS has a lower expense ratio. BSJS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.