BSJS vs IHYF
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco High Yield Bond Factor ETF
Which is better, BSJS or IHYF?
Nearly the same fund. IHYF costs less.
IHYF has a lower expense ratio. IHYF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJS | IHYF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $776M | $134M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.15% | 6.50% |
| Holdings | 349 | 432 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7% | 6.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7%Best | -36.0% |
| $10,000 over 5.2 years | $11,744 | $12,361Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | Nov 30, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 236 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BSJS has data through Oct 14, 2026 and IHYF through Feb 20, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 3, 2020 to Feb 20, 2026 (5.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSJS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.7% compared with 6.9% for IHYF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for BSJS and -36.0% for IHYF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJS charges 0.42% per year while IHYF charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $39 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJS currently yields 6.15% against 6.50% for IHYF.
Holdings Overlap
At least 7.9% of IHYF's money is in holdings BSJS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BSJS, our book for it covers 92.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IHYF and BSJS share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 369 days apart, BSJS as of Oct 4, 2026 and IHYF as of Sep 30, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
32 positions in common, counted across the 155 positions we hold weights for in BSJS and 396 in IHYF, against full books of 349 and 432.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSJS | Weight in IHYF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHTR 5 02/01/28 144ACco Holdings Llc 5 2/28 | 2.45% | 0.40% | 2.05% |
| OGN 4.125 04/30/28 1Organon + Co/Organon For Sr Secured 144A 04/28 4.125 | 2.06% | 0.38% | 1.68% |
| SIRI 4 07/15/28 144ASirius Xm Radio Llc 4% | 1.92% | 0.15% | 1.77% |
| TENINC 8 11/17/28 14Tenneco Inc 8% 11/17/28 | 1.88% | 0.19% | 1.69% |
| AVTR 4.625 07/15/28 | 1.51% | 0.10% | 1.41% |
| JEFFIN 5 08/15/28Jefferies Fin Llc / Jfin 5 08/15/2028 | 0.92% | 0.53% | 0.39% |
| AGPXXInvesco Government & Agency Portfolio, Institutional Class | 0.92% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
| FTAI 5.5 05/01/28 14Fortress Trans + Infrast Sr Unsecured 144A 05/28 5.5 | 0.98% | 0.34% | 0.64% |
| CLVTSC 3.875 07/01/2Clarivate Science Holdings Corp 3.88% 01Jul2028 | 0.76% | 0.46% | 0.30% |
| BHCCN 11 09/30/28 14Bausch Health Cos Inc 11% 30Sep2028 | 0.91% | 0.27% | 0.64% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSJS and IHYF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJS or IHYF?
BSJS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while IHYF charges 0.39%. IHYF is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BSJS or IHYF?
BSJS has been the more volatile fund at 7.7% annualized versus 6.9% for IHYF. Worst drawdown: BSJS -17.7% vs IHYF -36.0%.
Should I hold both BSJS and IHYF?
BSJS and IHYF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJS and IHYF?
At least 7.9% of IHYF's money is in holdings BSJS also owns. Our book for BSJS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 155 positions we hold weights for in BSJS and 396 in IHYF.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJS or IHYF?
BSJS yields 6.15% while IHYF yields 6.50%, so IHYF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IHYF better than BSJS?
IHYF has a lower expense ratio. IHYF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.