BSJS vs JHHY
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs John Hancock High Yield ETF
Which is better, BSJS or JHHY?
BSJS has been ahead.
BSJS has a lower expense ratio. BSJS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJS | JHHY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $776M | $133M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.15% | 7.19% |
| Holdings | 349 | 561 |
| YTD Return | +2.24%Best | -0.35% |
| 1Y Return | +3.71%Best | +1.35% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.69% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.13% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.1%Best | 3.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -4.4%Best | -5.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $11,738Best | $11,669 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | May 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
BSJS vs JHHY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
BSJS vs JHHY Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and John Hancock High Yield ETF (JHHY) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Over the past year BSJS returned +3.71% while JHHY returned +1.35%. Year to date, BSJS is up 2.24% versus a loss of 0.35% for JHHY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JHHY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3.9% compared with 3.1% for BSJS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.4% for BSJS and -5.0% for JHHY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJS charges 0.42% per year while JHHY charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $52 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJS currently yields 6.15% against 7.19% for JHHY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 155 holdings in BSJS and 409 in JHHY, totalling 92.9% and 62.7% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 23 positions appear in both.
23 positions in common, counted across the 155 positions we hold weights for in BSJS and 409 in JHHY, against full books of 349 and 561.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSJS | Weight in JHHY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TENINC 8 11/17/28 14Tenneco Inc 8% 11/17/28 | 1.88% | 0.17% | 1.71% |
| BLCOCN 8.375 10/01/2Bausch & Lomb 8.375% 10/01/28 | 1.41% | 0.09% | 1.32% |
| NWL 8.5 06/01/28 144Newell Brands I 8.5 6/28 8.5 | 1.31% | 0.09% | 1.22% |
| XIFR 8.625 03/15/33 | 0.96% | 0.29% | 0.67% |
| JEFFIN 5 08/15/28Jefferies Fin Llc / Jfin 5 08/15/2028 | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.59% |
| CIVI 9.625 06/15/33 | 0.82% | 0.27% | 0.55% |
| BHCCN 11 09/30/28 14Bausch Health Cos Inc 11% 30Sep2028 | 0.91% | 0.15% | 0.76% |
| CWENA 4.75 03/15/28 | 0.83% | 0.22% | 0.61% |
| GSYCN 9.25 12/01/28 | 0.54% | 0.40% | 0.14% |
| UAN 6.125 06/15/28 1Cvr Partners Lp/Cvr Nitrogen Finan 6.12% 06/15/2028 | 0.55% | 0.29% | 0.26% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSJS and JHHY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJS or JHHY?
BSJS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while JHHY charges 0.52%. BSJS is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSJS or JHHY?
Over the past year BSJS returned +3.71% vs +1.35% for JHHY, so BSJS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSJS or JHHY?
JHHY has been the more volatile fund at 3.9% annualized versus 3.1% for BSJS. Worst drawdown: BSJS -4.4% vs JHHY -5.0%.
Should I hold both BSJS and JHHY?
BSJS and JHHY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJS or JHHY?
BSJS yields 6.15% while JHHY yields 7.19%, so JHHY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JHHY better than BSJS?
BSJS has a lower expense ratio. BSJS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.