BSJS vs RSF
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc.
Which is better, BSJS or RSF?
Each has led over a different period.
BSJS has a lower expense ratio. BSJS led over 3Y, RSF over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJS | RSF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42%Best | 5.25% |
| AUM | $776M | $49M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.15% | 11.07% |
| Holdings | 349 | 9,552 |
| YTD Return | +2.24% | +7.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.71% | +7.39%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.69%Best | +8.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.13% | +3.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.2%Tie | 7.2%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7% | -13.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,666 | $11,980Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | RiverNorth |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | High Yield Bond | High Yield Bond |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2020 | Sep 22, 2016 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2020 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.1 years).
BSJS vs RSF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.1 years both funds cover.
BSJS vs RSF Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc. (RSF) is an ETF from RiverNorth. Over the past year BSJS returned +3.71% while RSF returned +7.39%. Year to date, BSJS is up 2.24% versus a gain of 7.42% for RSF.
Over three years, BSJS compounded at +8.69% per year against +8.18% for RSF; over five years the annualized figures are +3.13% and +3.68% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, RSF has the edge at +8.97% annualized vs +3.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSJS and RSF have been equally volatile, both at 7.2% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for BSJS and -13.1% for RSF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJS charges 0.42% per year while RSF charges 5.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $525 annually, a gap of $483 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJS currently yields 6.15% against 11.07% for RSF.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 155 holdings in BSJS and 15 in RSF, totalling 92.9% and 5.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 96 days apart, BSJS as of Oct 4, 2026 and RSF as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 155 positions we hold weights for in BSJS and 15 in RSF, against full books of 349 and 9,552.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSJS and RSF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJS or RSF?
BSJS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while RSF charges 5.25%. BSJS is the cheaper option, by $483 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSJS or RSF?
Over the past year BSJS returned +3.71% vs +7.39% for RSF, so RSF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BSJS annualized +3.40% vs +8.97% for RSF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSJS or RSF?
BSJS and RSF have been equally volatile, both at 7.2% annualized. Worst drawdown: BSJS -17.7% vs RSF -13.1%.
Should I hold both BSJS and RSF?
BSJS and RSF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJS or RSF?
BSJS yields 6.15% while RSF yields 11.07%, so RSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSF better than BSJS?
BSJS has a lower expense ratio. BSJS led over 3Y, RSF over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.