BSR vs HRTS
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF vs Tema Heart & Health ETF
Which is better, BSR or HRTS?
HRTS has been ahead.
HRTS has a lower expense ratio. HRTS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. HRTS is less concentrated, with 48.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSR | HRTS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $53M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 1.30% |
| Holdings | 60 | 92 |
| YTD Return | +4.18%Best | +2.75% |
| 1Y Return | +5.97% | +14.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.36% | +13.00%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.2%Best | 17.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -24.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $12,826 | $14,254Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 73.0% | 48.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Beacon Capital Management | Tema Global Limited |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 17, 2023 | Nov 20, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
BSR vs HRTS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
BSR vs HRTS Performance
Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF (BSR) is an ETF from Beacon Capital Management and Tema Heart & Health ETF (HRTS) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited. Over the past year BSR returned +5.97% while HRTS returned +14.59%. Year to date, BSR is up 4.18% versus a gain of 2.75% for HRTS.
Over three years, BSR compounded at +8.36% per year against +13.00% for HRTS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HRTS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 9.2% for BSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for BSR and -24.7% for HRTS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSR charges 1.09% per year while HRTS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $75 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSR currently yields 2.78% against 1.30% for HRTS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 29 holdings in BSR and 46 in HRTS, totalling 99.8% and 100.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BSR and 46 in HRTS, against full books of 60 and 92.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 38 positions for HRTS that do not appear in our book for BSR (82.8% of the fund), and 29 for BSR that do not appear in HRTS (99.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSR and HRTS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSR or HRTS?
BSR has an expense ratio of 1.09% while HRTS charges 0.75%. HRTS is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSR or HRTS?
Over the past year BSR returned +5.97% vs +14.59% for HRTS, so HRTS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSR or HRTS?
HRTS has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 9.2% for BSR. Worst drawdown: BSR -15.7% vs HRTS -24.7%.
Should I hold both BSR and HRTS?
BSR and HRTS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSR or HRTS?
BSR yields 2.78% while HRTS yields 1.30%, so BSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HRTS better than BSR?
HRTS has a lower expense ratio. HRTS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. HRTS is less concentrated, with 48.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.