BSR vs ZJAN

BSR vs ZJAN

Which is better, BSR or ZJAN?

Each has led over a different period.

ZJAN has a lower expense ratio. BSR led over 1Y, ZJAN over the full window.

Lower Fees: ZJANHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBSRZJAN
Expense Ratio1.09%0.79%Best
AUM$34M$109M
Dividend Yield2.78%0.00%
Holdings6015
YTD Return+4.18%Best+3.98%
1Y Return+5.97%Best+5.91%
3Y Return (annualized)+8.36%-
Volatility (annualized)7.3%2.4%Best
Max Drawdown-15.7%-3.2%Best
$10,000 over 1.8 years$10,916$11,130Best
Fund FamilyBeacon Capital ManagementInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 17, 2023Jan 2, 2025

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).

BSR vs ZJAN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.

Compare BSR against instead:BSR vs SPYBSR vs QQQBSR vs VOOBSR vs VTIZJAN against:ZJAN vs VXUS

BSR vs ZJAN Performance

Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF (BSR) is an ETF from Beacon Capital Management and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year BSR returned +5.97% while ZJAN returned +5.91%. Year to date, BSR is up 4.18% versus a gain of 3.98% for ZJAN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 7.3% compared with 2.4% for ZJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for BSR and -3.2% for ZJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BSR charges 1.09% per year while ZJAN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $79 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSR currently yields 2.78% against 0.00% for ZJAN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BSR and ZJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BSRZJAN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BSR or ZJAN?

BSR has an expense ratio of 1.09% while ZJAN charges 0.79%. ZJAN is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BSR or ZJAN?

Over the past year BSR returned +5.97% vs +5.91% for ZJAN, so BSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BSR annualized +4.99% vs +6.13% for ZJAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BSR or ZJAN?

BSR has been the more volatile fund at 7.3% annualized versus 2.4% for ZJAN. Worst drawdown: BSR -15.7% vs ZJAN -3.2%.

Should I hold both BSR and ZJAN?

BSR and ZJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BSR or ZJAN?

BSR yields 2.78% while ZJAN yields 0.00%, so BSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZJAN better than BSR?

ZJAN has a lower expense ratio. BSR led over 1Y, ZJAN over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.