BSVO vs DFAT
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF vs Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF
Which is better, BSVO or DFAT?
Nearly the same fund. DFAT costs less.
DFAT has a lower expense ratio. BSVO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSVO | DFAT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.28%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $30.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.27% | 1.40% |
| Holdings | 639 | 1,234 |
| YTD Return | +20.21%Best | +13.08% |
| 1Y Return | +26.88%Best | +18.14% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.59%Best | +16.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.45% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 18.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.5% | -26.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $17,190Best | $16,451 |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Dimensional |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2010 | Dec 11, 1998 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 13, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.6 years).
BSVO vs DFAT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
BSVO vs DFAT Performance
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) is an ETF from Dimensional. Over the past year BSVO returned +26.88% while DFAT returned +18.14%. Year to date, BSVO is up 20.21% versus a gain of 13.08% for DFAT.
Over three years, BSVO compounded at +18.59% per year against +16.01% for DFAT. Across the full 4-year window we track, BSVO has the edge at +16.24% annualized vs +14.83%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSVO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 18.5% for DFAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.5% for BSVO and -26.1% for DFAT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSVO charges 0.45% per year while DFAT charges 0.28%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $28 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSVO currently yields 1.27% against 1.40% for DFAT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 630 holdings in BSVO and 1,141 in DFAT, totalling 99.8% and 72.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 630 positions we hold weights for in BSVO and 1,141 in DFAT, against full books of 639 and 1,234.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSVO and DFAT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSVO or DFAT?
BSVO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while DFAT charges 0.28%. DFAT is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSVO or DFAT?
Over the past year BSVO returned +26.88% vs +18.14% for DFAT, so BSVO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BSVO annualized +16.24% vs +14.83% for DFAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSVO or DFAT?
BSVO has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 18.5% for DFAT. Worst drawdown: BSVO -27.5% vs DFAT -26.1%.
Should I hold both BSVO and DFAT?
BSVO and DFAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSVO or DFAT?
BSVO yields 1.27% while DFAT yields 1.40%, so DFAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DFAT better than BSVO?
DFAT has a lower expense ratio. BSVO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.