BTCL vs GJUN
T-Rex 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Which is better, BTCL or GJUN?
GJUN has been ahead.
GJUN has a lower expense ratio. GJUN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTCL | GJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.85%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $511M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.45% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 4 | 10 |
| YTD Return | -37.84% | +6.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | -64.80% | +8.70%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 95.7% | 5.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -84.3% | -11.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $7,983 | $12,220Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jul 10, 2024 | Jun 16, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
BTCL vs GJUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
BTCL vs GJUN Performance
T-Rex 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) is an ETF from REX Shares and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year BTCL returned -64.80% while GJUN returned +8.70%. Year to date, BTCL is down 37.84% versus a gain of 6.43% for GJUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTCL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 95.7% compared with 5.3% for GJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.3% for BTCL and -11.0% for GJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTCL charges 0.95% per year while GJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $85 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTCL currently yields 2.45% against 0.00% for GJUN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BTCL and GJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTCL or GJUN?
BTCL has an expense ratio of 0.95% while GJUN charges 0.85%. GJUN is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BTCL or GJUN?
Over the past year BTCL returned -64.80% vs +8.70% for GJUN, so GJUN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTCL annualized -9.33% vs +9.11% for GJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BTCL or GJUN?
BTCL has been the more volatile fund at 95.7% annualized versus 5.3% for GJUN. Worst drawdown: BTCL -84.3% vs GJUN -11.0%.
Should I hold both BTCL and GJUN?
BTCL and GJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTCL or GJUN?
BTCL yields 2.45% while GJUN yields 0.00%, so BTCL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GJUN better than BTCL?
GJUN has a lower expense ratio. GJUN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.