BTGD vs CAOS
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF vs Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
Which is better, BTGD or CAOS?
Each has led over a different period.
CAOS has a lower expense ratio. BTGD led over the full window, CAOS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTGD | CAOS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.63%Best |
| AUM | $102M | $705M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.28% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 12 |
| YTD Return | -27.02% | +1.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | -41.02% | +1.45%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +3.57% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.1% | 1.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -3.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,122Best | $10,496 |
| Fund Family | Quantify Funds | Alpha Architect |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2024 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
BTGD vs CAOS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BTGD vs CAOS Performance
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) is an ETF from Quantify Funds and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) is an ETF from Alpha Architect. Over the past year BTGD returned -41.02% while CAOS returned +1.45%. Year to date, BTGD is down 27.02% versus a gain of 1.68% for CAOS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTGD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.1% compared with 1.1% for CAOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for BTGD and -3.6% for CAOS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTGD charges 1.09% per year while CAOS charges 0.63%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $63 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTGD currently yields 4.28% against 0.00% for CAOS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in BTGD and 1 in CAOS, totalling 51.0% and 0.1% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in BTGD and 1 in CAOS, against full books of 10 and 12.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BTGD | Weight in CAOS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 45.79% | 0.10% | 45.69% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BTGD and CAOS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTGD or CAOS?
BTGD has an expense ratio of 1.09% while CAOS charges 0.63%. CAOS is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BTGD or CAOS?
Over the past year BTGD returned -41.02% vs +1.45% for CAOS, so CAOS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTGD annualized +14.55% vs +2.45% for CAOS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BTGD or CAOS?
BTGD has been the more volatile fund at 53.1% annualized versus 1.1% for CAOS. Worst drawdown: BTGD -58.8% vs CAOS -3.6%.
Should I hold both BTGD and CAOS?
BTGD and CAOS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTGD or CAOS?
BTGD yields 4.28% while CAOS yields 0.00%, so BTGD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CAOS better than BTGD?
CAOS has a lower expense ratio. BTGD led over the full window, CAOS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.