BTGD vs ETHU
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF vs 2x Ether ETF
Which is better, BTGD or ETHU?
BTGD has been ahead.
BTGD has a lower expense ratio. BTGD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTGD | ETHU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09%Best | 2.97% |
| AUM | $102M | $1.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.28% | 1.52% |
| Holdings | 10 | 4 |
| YTD Return | -27.02%Best | -59.38% |
| 1Y Return | -41.02%Best | -79.97% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.1%Best | 161.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8%Best | -95.4% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,122Best | $2,176 |
| Fund Family | Quantify Funds | Volatility Shares, LLC |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2024 | Jun 4, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
BTGD vs ETHU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
BTGD vs ETHU Performance
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) is an ETF from Quantify Funds and 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) is an ETF from Volatility Shares, LLC. Over the past year BTGD returned -41.02% while ETHU returned -79.97%. Year to date, BTGD is down 27.02% versus a loss of 59.38% for ETHU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ETHU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 161.5% compared with 53.1% for BTGD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for BTGD and -95.4% for ETHU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTGD charges 1.09% per year while ETHU charges 2.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $297 annually, a gap of $188 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTGD currently yields 4.28% against 1.52% for ETHU.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BTGD and ETHU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTGD or ETHU?
BTGD has an expense ratio of 1.09% while ETHU charges 2.97%. BTGD is the cheaper option, by $188 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BTGD or ETHU?
Over the past year BTGD returned -41.02% vs -79.97% for ETHU, so BTGD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTGD annualized +14.55% vs -53.35% for ETHU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BTGD or ETHU?
ETHU has been the more volatile fund at 161.5% annualized versus 53.1% for BTGD. Worst drawdown: BTGD -58.8% vs ETHU -95.4%.
Should I hold both BTGD and ETHU?
BTGD and ETHU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTGD or ETHU?
BTGD yields 4.28% while ETHU yields 1.52%, so BTGD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ETHU better than BTGD?
BTGD has a lower expense ratio. BTGD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.