BTGD vs PMAY
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - May
Which is better, BTGD or PMAY?
Each has led over a different period.
PMAY has a lower expense ratio. BTGD led over the full window, PMAY over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BTGD | PMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $102M | $820M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.28% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 12 |
| YTD Return | -27.02% | +7.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | -41.02% | +9.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.1% | 3.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -9.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,122Best | $12,010 |
| Fund Family | Quantify Funds | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 15, 2024 | Apr 30, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
BTGD vs PMAY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
BTGD vs PMAY Performance
STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) is an ETF from Quantify Funds and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year BTGD returned -41.02% while PMAY returned +9.34%. Year to date, BTGD is down 27.02% versus a gain of 7.13% for PMAY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTGD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.1% compared with 3.4% for PMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for BTGD and -9.4% for PMAY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BTGD charges 1.09% per year while PMAY charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $79 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BTGD currently yields 4.28% against 0.00% for PMAY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BTGD and PMAY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BTGD or PMAY?
BTGD has an expense ratio of 1.09% while PMAY charges 0.79%. PMAY is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BTGD or PMAY?
Over the past year BTGD returned -41.02% vs +9.34% for PMAY, so PMAY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BTGD annualized +14.55% vs +9.59% for PMAY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BTGD or PMAY?
BTGD has been the more volatile fund at 53.1% annualized versus 3.4% for PMAY. Worst drawdown: BTGD -58.8% vs PMAY -9.4%.
Should I hold both BTGD and PMAY?
BTGD and PMAY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BTGD or PMAY?
BTGD yields 4.28% while PMAY yields 0.00%, so BTGD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PMAY better than BTGD?
PMAY has a lower expense ratio. BTGD led over the full window, PMAY over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.