BUFC vs BUFM
AB Conservative Buffer ETF vs AB Moderate Buffer ETF
Which is better, BUFC or BUFM?
BUFM has been ahead.
BUFM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFC | BUFM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69%Tie | 0.69%Tie |
| AUM | $1.1B | $492M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 7 | 7 |
| YTD Return | +5.05%Best | +4.67% |
| 1Y Return | +7.23% | +7.70%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.5%Best | 5.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.3%Best | -9.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $11,008 | $11,674Best |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Dec 9, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
BUFC vs BUFM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
BUFC vs BUFM Performance
AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year BUFC returned +7.23% while BUFM returned +7.70%. Year to date, BUFC is up 5.05% versus a gain of 4.67% for BUFM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BUFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.3% compared with 3.5% for BUFC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.3% for BUFC and -9.4% for BUFM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFC charges 0.69% per year while BUFM charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $69 annually. On income, BUFC currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for BUFM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BUFC and BUFM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFC or BUFM?
BUFC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while BUFM charges 0.69%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, BUFC or BUFM?
Over the past year BUFC returned +7.23% vs +7.70% for BUFM, so BUFM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BUFC annualized +5.48% vs +8.98% for BUFM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BUFC or BUFM?
BUFM has been the more volatile fund at 5.3% annualized versus 3.5% for BUFC. Worst drawdown: BUFC -8.3% vs BUFM -9.4%.
Should I hold both BUFC and BUFM?
BUFC and BUFM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFC or BUFM?
BUFC yields 0.00% while BUFM yields 0.00%, so BUFM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BUFM better than BUFC?
BUFM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.